X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:content-type;
	bh=EEYafvmmg4IgkdDIhZXWniAKDyhNgygh+Ux/Bvkrd0s=;
	b=dYTv/2hyUYRrGSEhgnnKM6F3j6TM/Ki2F25RUCKan6pMOzDNwkKfDxxLSV4CV7AfR8
	lJBqXVQ8Li9EAZ4UjH9+6J3bQ9udZw3Q/iNrE6B/A4A4pfI5kx+53lNrxmOqXkTdNhL/
	B5eib4REc9mC2pUn400NI1n9d471T5q6cIT3bbjBZH/yFO67zjxR4YxXmsyOy2372Q/0
	WxL/fqlRKSPmeMa4tR8hhDCcoFs6L03uAQ9UQfL43ZLQMUJp4eT3SucFhMq2wgIDPI4g
	eYqP0HOi05XDqN1DzBiOcsf0KurGgQAjtkrt5nPOK4D+zLbYQXb972md01OrBNw5yEX7
	K5iQ==
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Received:	by 10.112.198.198 with SMTP id je6mr33328260lbc.31.1442449111589;
	Wed, 16 Sep 2015 17:18:31 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To:	<CAM2RGhQi_Z7wCW_sv=y0V4KDMDGMKFL0tzd45Td5=RAWr3vBPw@mail.gmail.com>
References:	<CAM2RGhTbgUfGJZacRUQ=3VBAKtd0F7OV37oRZFVjHR4A9XecnA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<mtcrq3$lue$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org>
	<CAM2RGhQi_Z7wCW_sv=y0V4KDMDGMKFL0tzd45Td5=RAWr3vBPw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
Date:	Thu, 17 Sep 2015 00:18:31 +0000
Message-ID:	<CAM2RGhR1QKXdjZvfuaxTbDXLnhiw0cGxaLz9GQZzSc6A2=QVOA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: [Geda-developers] PLEASE STOP !!! - Re: [geda-user] Apollon
From:	"Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	gEDA users mailing list <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 12:01 AM, Evan Foss <evanfoss AT gmail DOT com> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 10:51 PM, Kai-Martin Knaak
> <knaak AT iqo DOT uni-hannover DOT de> wrote:
>> Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-
>> user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
>>
>>> I understand that you have contributed meaningfully to this project but
>>> we need a team to be blessed by the powers that be.
>>
>> In my very humble opinion, we need a working team in the first place. The
>> keyword here is "working" as opposed to let patches bit rot, not decide
>> weather or not a feature branch should get merged or abandoned, or not the
>> least, procrastinate releases and have no road map with goals for future
>> development whatsoever. Everything else should come second.
>> (Sorry for the harsh words. But realistically, the above characterizes the
>> progress of the geda project since about 2008 for the most part. Yes,
>> there were significant improvements in some areas and I am glad about it.
>> Else, I would have switched away since long. But seen from a distance the
>> progress looks glacially -- in particular when compared to projects like
>> freecad or kicad)
>

To be fair a number of people have been working on the anti-fork
effort and are making some progress. This is what I was getting at
when I said focusing on a stable release.

I feel like I already answered in my earlier comments on this thread.

- Raw text -