X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
Date:	Wed, 16 Sep 2015 13:53:08 -0400
Message-Id:	<201509161753.t8GHr83L007994@envy.delorie.com>
From:	DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to:	<alpine.DEB.2.00.1509161940580.3528@lichen> (message from Roland
	Lutz on Wed, 16 Sep 2015 19:45:12 +0200 (CEST))
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] off-topic: key bindings
References:	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1509131209260 DOT 6924 AT igor2priv> <55F5EFB6 DOT 6050809 AT ecosensory DOT com> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1509140349440 DOT 6924 AT igor2priv> <20150914100244 DOT 4c371d64616a1ca14f7e3912 AT gmail DOT com> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1509161940580 DOT 3528 AT lichen>
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> Emacs-like key bindings make sense since they are the de-facto standard 
> for Unix/Linux applications.

Except PCB has a vi-like command interface.  Editor wars HYPE!  :-)

In reality, the key bindings that "make sense" are those set forth in
the common user interface guides for things like Motif, Gnome, and
KDE.  That's what ever other app is already using, for the most part.

- Raw text -