X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references
	:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to
	:user-agent;
	bh=pG8oJtRq/CB5mNpyEcvasxYj0pCnGTJtu6Bcp37y+xY=;
	b=v0cbJ1KMgv2doCRlAqgbIN4Mrs0zMVZuLzHBxo71krm8Ouf8bgHyy7IDEX1HWcfCDn
	0niCCLhIWC2ixsqLyforw9p258X4Hj+7mo+utr6guxIpx8yxqg7rj9u7wT+Qedz1ydtE
	22Zyekdzg1S7L4EM+r2/xQYXZaNbq8ijhQT5CGbUdTERnIMUUhbcgOXkdMeRcg18aknq
	DnqogGVEgqGzH4oiLJdW9j3hfnh9gYHqUK1uBAlWv5iI+K20QUZcOx/pbxu9yI/RuFbL
	dRuXQGHuawphhIAjXsieVMV8kj+Gsde5sch7n3V/y3klOsiuNWqW7lS5owL9yjDcMPJ4
	leXw==
X-Received:	by 10.152.9.9 with SMTP id v9mr24865277laa.111.1442358655290;
	Tue, 15 Sep 2015 16:10:55 -0700 (PDT)
Date:	Wed, 16 Sep 2015 02:10:53 +0300
From:	"Vladimir Zhbanov (vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Code of Conduct
Message-ID:	<20150915231053.GD2747@localhost.localdomain>
Mail-Followup-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
References:	<msv461$cng$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org>
	<20150913003447 DOT GB16820 AT localhost DOT localdomain>
	<55F5BB3F DOT 3050608 AT jump-ing DOT de>
	<201509131831 DOT t8DIVeXi028695 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<55F5C8FC DOT 1000601 AT jump-ing DOT de>
	<201509132026 DOT t8DKQJf5000642 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<55F5E644 DOT 10904 AT jump-ing DOT de>
	<201509132211 DOT t8DMB9b4004308 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<mt7j5d$req$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org>
	<55F7A6B0 DOT 2080404 AT xs4all DOT nl>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<55F7A6B0.2080404@xs4all.nl>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 07:03:44AM +0200, Bert Timmerman (bert DOT timmerman AT xs4all DOT nl) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
...
> I think there is no "passive-aggressive" wording in the gEDA Code of
> Conduct.
> 
> In the Code of Conduct I only see a list of pointers to decent and pollite
> behaviour, the way I would like to be treated and spoken to.
> 
> As far as I understood, its sole purpose is to create an environment for all
> participants in which they can feel safe to contribute to the best of their
> ability.
> 
> Nothing more, nothing less, no hidden agendas.
> 
> I saw and still see no reason to discuss a template text from another FOSS
> project with minor modifications to make it gEDA specific.

Fully agreed.

Thanks,
  Vladimir

- Raw text -