X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:content-type;
	bh=nmLhhpev431zbtjMeKqqNUYwZgFF5m/1/wsk6a8xuQo=;
	b=BAR3dJS7eAhnqVjD7yyqRorMmWS8z4oJ8PO8mLUwaB7tSUC+hpt44CAewP+i1fSSez
	Cb8ifF6pYa56XghXKRCSvGF57TC/KATmFh3WZaVT9YwHxHNMJkEqGNoxRNcKo/41QJm7
	zM/Ki/g3fjFJr/b1D5qrB3cNFMZMhGT5dLtRGrgB8km46PNYBozXQ59q9gJ6WznwLLHp
	/pKv3M6xpxupC22zP4QdIIIB2DKQ0RnSi+daV4znD0dpbeQ0+2nZHN7rdb/gS4zbyR8m
	ZV7vKXEkWvU1NTvR7Aa9ZiVQnGnWtsp0h55PwRudcvLdfk2p1sAPIWM9V1F/MPQ8tY/c
	9beg==
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Received:	by 10.152.22.73 with SMTP id b9mr23936660laf.83.1442344039268;
	Tue, 15 Sep 2015 12:07:19 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To:	<CA+KzSg+mWSMrq0k0u5ZfEM2X3Bd2OR_U4TxAVY7t7OJ6o5taKg@mail.gmail.com>
References:	<55F7EE7F DOT 101 AT unige DOT ch>
	<20150915115059 DOT 5939 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se>
	<55F81EDD DOT 70603 AT jump-ing DOT de>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1509151410560 DOT 6924 AT igor2priv>
	<20150915140853 DOT 16535 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se>
	<CA+KzSg+mWSMrq0k0u5ZfEM2X3Bd2OR_U4TxAVY7t7OJ6o5taKg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
Date:	Tue, 15 Sep 2015 15:07:19 -0400
Message-ID:	<CAM2RGhRhrkq_FfwHXy9fQKr=NDmf9KEYvpc1o+uLfD4W44PLfA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Happy birthday
From:	"Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 1:27 PM, Mitch Davis
(mjd+geda-user AT hackvana DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]
<geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 12:08 AM, Peter Stuge (peter AT stuge DOT se) wrote:
>>
>>
>> I could tell a long tale about an open source project that was hijacked
>> by persons who did not value such stability, but instead valued high
>> frequency of commits, with less regard for commit contents, but I
>> don't want to go into that here.
>
>
> It's ok, KiCad's back on track now LOL.

Were they having trouble? I don't really follow that project.

>   http://kicad-pcb.org/post/2015-release-candidate/
>
> Mitch.



-- 
Home
http://evanfoss.googlepages.com/
Work
http://forge.abcd.harvard.edu/gf/project/epl_engineering/wiki/

- Raw text -