X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:content-type;
	bh=jUk7jIDvkyGb3FwOcUQMdqttd4lx39TF9VRhdjbOtnQ=;
	b=mw3GLi0u6pTreJO0QYy7WDKw9eOuiJnmCkRL1zbEwsrxlGbU/rZqc1aRkNZ0Vut5Wk
	vgbA1niJoTmfDzcaamjdlgxy7a0UrL/99OkWmfxwU2pdyoZ5r0TtGS36prn4bw24W73S
	chWwgmV0gy+Akl6RlXAARa7UdUTl619GIVgtUFeFN1lI4Fs3oLC6npVcm+yZN7UWNgYZ
	PBU9sFbHxf/vd8VobtbwStcBVXRl8BJXgPGWatqaMzjnHX5lkLD1Nb6DrqbsXjBMJEtN
	SeTnLpp7qpwr6JmxZlVFdJwbbQzPhGrZD92/xZD0OkAiL/sWg9zNa0yjitpZUhxnl4Eq
	fEkA==
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Received:	by 10.152.22.73 with SMTP id b9mr21732840laf.83.1442328512334;
	Tue, 15 Sep 2015 07:48:32 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To:	<FXM.JVj9.72U2vXC1esF.1L{0cc@seznam.cz>
References:	<FXM.JVj9.72U2vXC1esF.1L{0cc AT seznam DOT cz>
Date:	Tue, 15 Sep 2015 10:48:32 -0400
Message-ID:	<CAM2RGhQO-9wac22EY5dvjbz91X4MFNNKmNPqDG35FXDwunqcHg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Fwd: gaf improvement - moving of components
From:	"Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 8:05 AM, Vaclav Peroutka (vaclavpe AT seznam DOT cz)
[via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
>
>
> Hello,
>
> as in another thread there is discussion about gaf state, I have one idea to
> gaf improvement regarding movement of already connected components. I do not
> know how it is hard to implement it in the current gaf. But as first
> iteration
> it can be enough if pin is taken as net with length of zero. And then this
> net is extended in the direction of movement.
>
> For example, the bottom left result can be done by moving R1 left, then
> down,
> then right. For me this is still simpler than to remove the net, move the
> component and then add the new net again.
>
> Second iteration is check if currently extending net does not overlay
> another
> item on the board ( component, net, text etc) and automatic splitting nets
> in
> the middle or near other items.
>
> What do you think about it ?

Sorry to say this but I don't think you are supposed to join nets like
that. I said this back then. Other people cited nondescript technical
reasons.

http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.cad.geda.user/40275

> Vaclav

Evan

-- 
Home
http://evanfoss.googlepages.com/
Work
http://forge.abcd.harvard.edu/gf/project/epl_engineering/wiki/

- Raw text -