X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:content-type;
	bh=snKNXIcHJbu+3SNUT3RtpkWxllX8w9dsmj9UMxNXDLw=;
	b=ucHAP5vGvbXhsf4aVacKcjWd6AbLJdynjmmtflxx3zm9nBr7KRecSQfP+8DfQXhWob
	gmldhvr/sk3T8ntPH6ST2CbZJYsEGZViDZnbW7kXVILmSEmCkLmwLOJ77j+KFsNAbn8J
	fJoTnuOSq0b8F80jvCa7trixhcJftUxWh5O+npZopY4wkhvBmOv5FM6WPEXMURQj3d1E
	qFaR0EyuAxZQsdR70vMA2Q0ULlAWdfDrg+YXwVZtROQy6XzoPPhJDG8owWS8TGqiZIcl
	oyqHB7lWxh+shUp8CP1QdGIKNsSp8KpV8pT5pvumDW4VWuVI+2tMBpAicGdYpUTqi4Sq
	EojQ==
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Received:	by 10.152.120.164 with SMTP id ld4mr21306478lab.84.1442326351207;
	Tue, 15 Sep 2015 07:12:31 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To:	<20150915115059.5939.qmail@stuge.se>
References:	<55F7EE7F DOT 101 AT unige DOT ch>
	<20150915115059 DOT 5939 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se>
Date:	Tue, 15 Sep 2015 10:12:31 -0400
Message-ID:	<CAM2RGhTwQQcgmwh1VuYw4pKgWq4Gn0K5q3oGTJ6VXu3B5UoEiw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Happy birthday
From:	"Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 7:50 AM, Peter Stuge (peter AT stuge DOT se) [via
geda-user AT delorie DOT com] <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
> Juergen Harms (juergen DOT harms AT unige DOT ch) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
>> distributions have the policy of strictly limiting the distributed
>> software to stable versions of upstream packages.
>
> Yes, it's really sad that distributions offer so little added value.
> There is a huge potential for distribution differentiation in
> following upstreams much more closely. Oh well.

I run gentoo and for all it's faults (of which there are many) a lot
of software has packages that are stable, unstable and cvs. Oddly geda
only has stable and unstable.

>> this average user does not profit from the results of what is being
>> discussed on this list: geda-gaf probably looks more or less dead
>> to him. Can this be improved?
>
> Yes it can. It requires man- and womanpower for release engineering,
> which is sometimes very easy and sometimes not easy at all. One part
> is the mechanical package creation, more challenging is to tie up all
> loose ends that are hanging around, so that a release can be made
> with a promise of being a consistent improvement (minimize regressions).
>
> It is possible to help with this process as a user, but it does
> require stepping out of the package manager box, and potentially
> even building from source yourself. :\
>
>
> Kind regards
>
> //Peter



-- 
Home
http://evanfoss.googlepages.com/
Work
http://forge.abcd.harvard.edu/gf/project/epl_engineering/wiki/

- Raw text -