X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=m0n5t3r.info; s=m0n5t3r;
	h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version
	:in-reply-to:content-type;
	bh=UCg2TJkHHtSue9O7JdavQEJi2ymFAdlVSjtIqEGDTxQ=;
	b=CM8LX0myPr7su209QeTR+nSgSh+bGrEofhbXbjGCal/nNlcStrWD5PmPlPfqQSVhmW
	COzEPhLkeEaTsZ777wwM7aFqSZax1kGOj/DzJYwU2RRuh1dwoGRnv3VB4pi6u/rhOOn+
	yM9dctdbMjIHMaXnkZz9/0NcKbRl+My+A1NhM=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
	h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date
	:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type;
	bh=UCg2TJkHHtSue9O7JdavQEJi2ymFAdlVSjtIqEGDTxQ=;
	b=m2vzierFauKpRLz14lS5Fa8mssKnxjJvxBRce+ufz1U5UjEL+qlVDNT1UyeBHyQlKI
	a1U5hu4II4fZfA6D6neAwg6XLuTYZHCcXCZ57c5fH2vG5ns2FRuyCKOvbc4WW5bgSjdz
	+BIbeztg1LdLyZ4k0Gb77P/z3iE4uK3ETVXfIcgmkmSbrUQQpYCgQdAzSAAA/8Vrf3V2
	qjhGYiZAAYfqAkmPISPnpLv2o/XricHMK2wYd0AVC9ELkzeiI3Sm+gWSLp0V8XEqeNQw
	26+LEKYlK9ZsihgsZEudO+HhW2H60axl1iWzLuov0DwAvd0f4htFF/UPPEYq5TVkjQPe
	lEJw==
X-Gm-Message-State:	ALoCoQmgv2mu1nkoK/l7+qBkjJwIdSEfdEWKa5J8YaOHyMrFgRypL7eUK73o4MoaLO+eKw2yuAX8
X-Received:	by 10.194.7.106 with SMTP id i10mr39079747wja.86.1442315352168;
	Tue, 15 Sep 2015 04:09:12 -0700 (PDT)
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] pcb's crosshair only half-locating violations
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
References:	<55F000F5 DOT 4090901 AT envinsci DOT co DOT uk> <55F04C94 DOT 4060401 AT jump-ing DOT de>
	<mspv5b$6dr$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org>
	<CAC4O8c_kGSiUWqcEtpjT44f2OavB2Z+=n0EQMN7ZWaQ1EZEiEw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<CAOFvGD6penfWAsnm7YN8R3nT9Qzgk9JZ4LDhGYQTQ92vv8xoGA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<55F2BFBD DOT 7010606 AT envinsci DOT co DOT uk> <55F2C43F DOT 7000907 AT jump-ing DOT de>
	<msv461$cng$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org> <20150913003447 DOT GB16820 AT localhost DOT localdomain>
	<55F5BB3F DOT 3050608 AT jump-ing DOT de> <201509131831 DOT t8DIVeXi028695 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<55F5C8FC DOT 1000601 AT jump-ing DOT de> <201509132026 DOT t8DKQJf5000642 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<55F5E644 DOT 10904 AT jump-ing DOT de> <201509132211 DOT t8DMB9b4004308 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<mt7j5d$req$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org>
From:	"Sabin Iacob (iacobs AT m0n5t3r DOT info) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
X-Enigmail-Draft-Status:	N1110
Message-ID:	<55F7FC56.9070205@m0n5t3r.info>
Date:	Tue, 15 Sep 2015 14:09:10 +0300
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
	Thunderbird/38.2.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<mt7j5d$req$1@ger.gmane.org>
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156)
--j2qEE6MkJN5Wm0B4QkTiHJQ3JpWmWaBvt
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 09/15/2015 01:53 AM, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
> DJ Delorie wrote:
>
>>> Having less than one person a month _is_ the problem.
>> Well, having less than one person a month is *A* problem, sure.  It's
>> just a different problem than blocking spammers.  The flood of
>> volunteers (ha!) didn't suddenly dry up when I changed the
>> registration method.
> Maybe, a pivotal point was when all user accounts got invalidated and=20
> everybody(?) needed to re-register. To actually get access you'd be=20
> required to formally agree to=20
> 	http://www.geda-project.org/CodeOfConduct.html
> The passive-aggressive wording of this never publicly discussed documen=
t=20
> made me hesitate to sign-up when I skipped over it, but I did anyway.=20
> Shortly after, the wiki moved to a different server and all editor=20
> accounts got invalidated again. This time I read more closely what I wa=
s=20
> supposed to sign.=20
>


apart from the one line filled with Americanisms (no swearing, no pr0n,
no talking about copyright infringement, etc.), I think it's a pretty
decent set of communication guidelines, actually, what's passive
aggressive about it?


--j2qEE6MkJN5Wm0B4QkTiHJQ3JpWmWaBvt
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
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=oWbb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--j2qEE6MkJN5Wm0B4QkTiHJQ3JpWmWaBvt--

- Raw text -