www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: geda-user/2015/09/14/16:04:51

X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Ironport-SBRS: None
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A2HvAQD+J/dV/52AA4BdgyOBPb1DAQ2HcgKBPDgUAQEBAQEBAQOBB4QkAQEEOi0iCxgJExIPBQ08E4gZAxIFxmMNhGUBAQgCAR+Gc4R9glCBblaDGIEUBY1th2qLEYFqk0WHPB8BAUKEIR4zin0BAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.17,530,1437462000";
d="scan'208";a="100394574"
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2015 13:04:10 -0700
From: Larry Doolittle <ldoolitt AT recycle DOT lbl DOT gov>
To: "Nicklas Karlsson (nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
Subject: Re: [geda-user] 5630 LED footprint
Message-ID: <20150914200410.GA14470@recycle.lbl.gov>
References: <20150910201416 DOT GG16766 AT fi DOT muni DOT cz>
<20150910234211 DOT e718beb2aa1655d22382c8a6 AT gmail DOT com>
<CAM2RGhSoJTOCovSOfARhH9rWzrPvj2_kP4GVaDG6Zr-910g8mQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
<201509102207 DOT t8AM7GOh013740 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
<20150914131629 DOT GB6914 AT cuci DOT nl>
<4D7DCB5F-5703-4EAB-ADFD-84D7E8A87764 AT noqsi DOT com>
<CAC4O8c9m7oioENN-c03sHL7RGP+ePA7ixNej9OauLskS8QeHJw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
<20150914213541 DOT aac6d90c6efa8b40da3ab0d2 AT gmail DOT com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20150914213541.aac6d90c6efa8b40da3ab0d2@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com

Nicklas -

On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 09:35:41PM +0200, Nicklas Karlsson (nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
> >   * From experience, I think polymer insulates much more than metal
> > So If the above is true I think the polymer would squash the dominant form
> > of dissipation and bare metal is better.
> Yes but layer is thin and emissivity is different.

Run the numbers and I think you'll find otherwise.

Cooling by radiation scales as the fourth power of
temperature, or really T_object^4 - T_environment^4.
It's hugely important above 1000 Kelvin, not so much
when you're talking about a 320 Kelvin object and a
290 Kelvin environment.

Heat carried away by moving air (convection) is all that matters
for electronics.  Unless you can get the cooling you need through
direct contact of aluminum, since the conductivity of aluminum
is 9000 x greater than that of still air.

  - Larry

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019