X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
	:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=rxlpcSnyG+7GcYj1l8k0luMpBw6ueg9jrVGajZvDl7k=;
	b=qVQFrTzq7je+NuZZDzHbfAURawetxHeXJTFgUhpb3H0IWUA7aBd4iPkp512PnQ/1OK
	s85Cx+p0+R1P5ztL8yfr+8NQ9KHPo4E4a38BirQRxguYSkrzhKtZ3qXs/vEgFnKcZd6I
	JR89i/yMZOKLSOO3P3ch9LNSxD0mXvlZUWe6lx81wiWF/LcEN9kjM8YsEC+ylNotM6r6
	0kgC97FovrnYxo5tcjomBMKbJBNUE0Mufk7DhFH1OeZcHNhWzpv0LBdR6T6bxY23K/qq
	RT250boj9Cw84X5PLAJYK8ZcLroMEg2GA3rsGQz0Lus5Ho5dPrOrc5PxsfUNR8wyPsC9
	zxFg==
X-Received:	by 10.180.211.39 with SMTP id mz7mr29348008wic.65.1442259346497;
	Mon, 14 Sep 2015 12:35:46 -0700 (PDT)
Date:	Mon, 14 Sep 2015 21:35:41 +0200
From:	"Nicklas Karlsson (nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] 5630 LED footprint
Message-Id:	<20150914213541.aac6d90c6efa8b40da3ab0d2@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To:	<CAC4O8c9m7oioENN-c03sHL7RGP+ePA7ixNej9OauLskS8QeHJw@mail.gmail.com>
References:	<20150910201416 DOT GG16766 AT fi DOT muni DOT cz>
	<20150910234211 DOT e718beb2aa1655d22382c8a6 AT gmail DOT com>
	<CAM2RGhSoJTOCovSOfARhH9rWzrPvj2_kP4GVaDG6Zr-910g8mQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<201509102207 DOT t8AM7GOh013740 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<20150914131629 DOT GB6914 AT cuci DOT nl>
	<4D7DCB5F-5703-4EAB-ADFD-84D7E8A87764 AT noqsi DOT com>
	<CAC4O8c9m7oioENN-c03sHL7RGP+ePA7ixNej9OauLskS8QeHJw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
X-Mailer:	Sylpheed 3.5.0beta1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

>   * From experience, I think polymer insulates much more than metal
> 
> So If the above is true I think the polymer would squash the dominant form
> of dissipation and bare metal is better.

Yes but layer is thin and emissivity is different.

- Raw text -