www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f |
X-Recipient: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
X-Original-DKIM-Signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; |
d=gmail.com; s=20120113; | |
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to | |
:content-type; | |
bh=W52xRlkXEUEL7/Mt+l/+qCl+KkfnL0CjAeBmjLCCmVE=; | |
b=l9Bbh5evddjiJwP+S37DxgO8GOWRqQg/KFuw08LZke8NWrY67ZYShX0PaGCeOl17cb | |
IQKcbBk54gTfJ0ojoABwuAmBE+O8/kxscAJ3tg53W9l/MjdIB01BPjw6x9zqDGdhyDDH | |
Q+ACa1scolHVRVRMVEM7UFRHnRlQr9qlfGZ0eFd+xbKESmcLLiFA43cLP9CvE0dCczAD | |
Tg41Qr1Vm8164Rko/snCkxSDpbNADFjglSwr1LcSLJmYJmZtMOHHIcjDxsyM/al64Nf2 | |
3yOCIaM8ps6XxZV3EcdAug8tkzSWgka7fFu28Qd2CRWbzT2ukYzVZTGtkA247Q5svF40 | |
Yw1g== | |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
X-Received: | by 10.194.109.97 with SMTP id hr1mr11324909wjb.38.1442092766450; |
Sat, 12 Sep 2015 14:19:26 -0700 (PDT) | |
In-Reply-To: | <20150912124632.3347c70a@jive.levalinux.org> |
References: | <CAC4O8c_XFEAgyrokrwwavB0C+OjWXCB5xptkVwMx2i_t960qFg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> |
<55F3FD8F DOT 4090709 AT jump-ing DOT de> | |
<20150912124632 DOT 3347c70a AT jive DOT levalinux DOT org> | |
Date: | Sat, 12 Sep 2015 13:19:26 -0800 |
Message-ID: | <CAC4O8c8qE2WkuKsu8=BtHGE9cRfU889yJcWvtpoBZnS0grM5Ag@mail.gmail.com> |
Subject: | Re: [geda-user] shortest way towards parsing .pcb files outside pcb |
From: | "Britton Kerin (britton DOT kerin AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> |
To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Reply-To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
On Sat, Sep 12, 2015 at 2:46 AM, Lev (leventelist AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote: > On Sat, 12 Sep 2015 12:25:19 +0200 > "Markus Hitter (mah AT jump-ing DOT de) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" > <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote: > >> A more worthwhile goal might be to /replace/ pcbs current storage and >> storage handling. > > Yes, this is what I/we try to achieve. My roadmap is this: > > 1. Define the new data structure. > > This is what I'm doing nowadays. So is this intended to consist of a superset of what's currently in a .pcb? If so, I think it's probably an ambitious mix of two different goals, one being a refactor of the parsing code the other an extension of the format. It might be best to tackle these one at a time, and I think the refactor should happen first. Please push as soon as possible. I don't want to start writing PCBFile class if you're currently doing exactly that.
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |