X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-TCPREMOTEIP:	207.224.51.38
X-Authenticated-UID:	jpd AT noqsi DOT com
Mime-Version:	1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] About reinventing the wheel, and how to avoid it
From:	John Doty <jpd AT noqsi DOT com>
In-Reply-To:	<20150911230843.GE7946@localhost.localdomain>
Date:	Fri, 11 Sep 2015 18:18:39 -0600
Message-Id:	<6DA3AD4E-1C13-4BD3-8B8B-57E9680079D3@noqsi.com>
References:	<960028A6-F16B-4276-B838-E9F0D2959A6F AT noqsi DOT com> <55F32375 DOT 2020505 AT ecosensory DOT com> <FC9C2933-89CE-44FD-A9EE-CA2721405ACE AT noqsi DOT com> <201509111941 DOT t8BJfqWl010427 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <D3D5A923-FAF9-4665-A0DB-A8D6A8BEA5A3 AT noqsi DOT com> <CA+uY=MS5ZOTHXDe9taav+0tCiZOqhtAJU2KO-xyRA3SrQVvLNw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <201509112020 DOT t8BKKBgI012564 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <E872F1BC-8FA7-449E-BA6D-5841AC79A465 AT noqsi DOT com> <201509112058 DOT t8BKwF3b013774 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <6341DF3E-543D-4E36-9B01-6B5B950208C4 AT noqsi DOT com> <20150911230843 DOT GE7946 AT localhost DOT localdomain>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailer:	Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id t8C0Ilqj020165
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Sep 11, 2015, at 5:08 PM, Vladimir Zhbanov (vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote:

> Who are those devs who decided the direction we are moving now?
> The geda-gaf moving to xorn seems to be a behind-the-scenes decision of
> some pcb devs.

I don’t think so. It’s really Roland’s show, with little to do with pcb specifically. Roland has actually reimplemented many (all?) of the standard gnetlist back ends. The only place we disagree is whether xorn-gnetlist replaces gnetlist or exists as an alternative. Roland's the only person promoting it as a replacement as far as I can tell.

> Where is collaboration here?

Well, Roland certainly did treat me as a stakeholder, privately. I really appreciate that.

> Who did ask active geda-gaf
> developers? Who did ask users?  Look, I don't use IRC, probably I've
> missed something happened last time... (?)

I think that all the developers who wanted to keep gEDA development an exclusive club are gone. So, it isn’t. We’ll see if this is good news or bad news.

John Doty              Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd.
http://www.noqsi.com/
jpd AT noqsi DOT com

- Raw text -