X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
	:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=MRrdGmutaphleV2vFee6l8NGIfNUaO4kiuFghWt+WY0=;
	b=nNCBsLnzNvMgZ/cpSGebDYfsAZSwwGaesKXD502d4NGkA01fkjDImH4bGy9y/TQ2DP
	Vjhwp1qWJIhgfJ7i9CdA7I1RtyORDYvqZ9x/Ry3C7MLlPeBZqp/BgBI4rnzMDUY2YA16
	zjCSgtV15uPsKJLkB0Zk6uPpVjnM4lMkrYuwh1ban5Wq/MBEPoLBj66s5kKpU1G228xd
	sDoGbxlhN8FPeg7L2WHLTVfSkh5KMM/LAYdNohG84MDg4xIb49neutlYZrpZsxNS1gyi
	fuIOBkD/yJlJGMVS7aVdvHR29s19u+ls1t5v6vo4v7ORZXrJmHZYNlNNcDNB6pe8TJPH
	Ntow==
X-Received:	by 10.194.122.132 with SMTP id ls4mr1242831wjb.130.1442004962811;
	Fri, 11 Sep 2015 13:56:02 -0700 (PDT)
Date:	Fri, 11 Sep 2015 22:55:58 +0200
From:	"Nicklas Karlsson (nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] About reinventing the wheel, and how to avoid it
Message-Id:	<20150911225558.bc2e1c16763f445fa04c3e5d@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To:	<201509112038.t8BKc3GP013110@envy.delorie.com>
References:	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1509111150410 DOT 2482 AT lichen>
	<B94E2C24-8B63-46FC-A551-9E4B14B817C9 AT noqsi DOT com>
	<201509111624 DOT t8BGOPYV000685 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<20150911190224 DOT 5b50175919e00b91df2ccf53 AT gmail DOT com>
	<201509111707 DOT t8BH7kS8004233 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<20150911222120 DOT e57a7e4dca6baabdbdf6287c AT gmail DOT com>
	<201509112038 DOT t8BKc3GP013110 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
X-Mailer:	Sylpheed 3.5.0beta1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Fri, 11 Sep 2015 16:38:03 -0400
DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com> wrote:

> 
> > Even though you have to remember attributes and values yourself it
> > is not just arbitrary text. For already defined attributes it would
> > have been nice with a list to choose from and for each attribute a
> > list of predefined values to chose from where appropriate.
> 
> It's not "just arbitrary" because some other tool (typically gnetlist
> for gschem) interprets the values.  But as far as gschem itself is
> concerned, aside from a few convenience pulldowns that provide
> commonly used defaults, the text really is just arbitrary.
> 
> If you were using gschem with something other than gnetlist, which had
> a different interpretation of the text, it would still not be "just
> arbitrary" to that other something, but not because gschem itself gave
> it any meaning.
> 
> Thus, my position that adding arbitrary text *in gschem* is not
> difficult.
> 
> The task is more difficult in something like pcb because the
> attributes have meaning *to pcb*, and pcb usually has to interpret
> them in realtime as the user is editing.  It's the meaning that causes
> the difficulty, not the attribute storage itself.  The realitime
> requirement often dictates a non-"arbitrary" internal storage as well.
> 
> (this is similar to the XML "problem" - XML defines a structure for
> storing information, but doesn't give any meaning to the information,
> leading to lots of incompatible implementations)


I agree.

- Raw text -