X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:content-type;
	bh=pSh0PJMs+090Y27WFoDxo+c6GFw66u3fjtM5rqvNDS8=;
	b=D5Zrw6QDIqUhfH6QPvn+4YIgbS28gJ3jo9kcGjDxHx2HyWa8k+hLtEWbX/jpFwV/T2
	NUoEw5ovuLhfs2kqKSmu0ph960LtvKGMQXTeVy0RX7611xAJEmp7E3ED7FJyfnLQiZhh
	gQKjb/9ScvcZXZf9xf5k7c8SSzuhdy/BHMmGOm5RpEVFd/faCwyNK6rOcRtBldYmx2Gt
	FGx+OtMBNG+3NdMP6QcoJ+05xxGVttqU7rjtv6G+22lB/4arW51GgjlGs4taET48PWl1
	TfOUZB7YG/cnKAFP/UAOHxAq69ft73x+Dn0j3f3erPhzDd7lFyUra3q0BJUZiRCn2hNU
	kkZg==
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Received:	by 10.180.187.227 with SMTP id fv3mr11306564wic.57.1441932557451;
	Thu, 10 Sep 2015 17:49:17 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To:	<CAOFvGD6penfWAsnm7YN8R3nT9Qzgk9JZ4LDhGYQTQ92vv8xoGA@mail.gmail.com>
References:	<55F000F5 DOT 4090901 AT envinsci DOT co DOT uk>
	<55F04C94 DOT 4060401 AT jump-ing DOT de>
	<mspv5b$6dr$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org>
	<CAC4O8c_kGSiUWqcEtpjT44f2OavB2Z+=n0EQMN7ZWaQ1EZEiEw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<CAOFvGD6penfWAsnm7YN8R3nT9Qzgk9JZ4LDhGYQTQ92vv8xoGA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
Date:	Thu, 10 Sep 2015 16:49:17 -0800
Message-ID:	<CAC4O8c-H4Pa3KNgv=B7Ty075Zzduux1Ktvdkd+hRso=KLf4+Ng@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] pcb's crosshair only half-locating violations
From:	"Britton Kerin (britton DOT kerin AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

31f2d454b34d2ad7bc93486c3bebddf5a1177c6c

On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 10:23 AM, Jason White
(whitewaterssoftwareinfo AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]
<geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote:

> On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 2:36 AM, Britton Kerin (britton DOT kerin AT gmail DOT com)
> [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 10:52 AM, Kai-Martin Knaak
>> <knaak AT iqo DOT uni-hannover DOT de> wrote:
>> > Markus Hitter wrote:
>> >
>> >> Whatever doesn't match intuitivity is a bug, isn't it? Then, we have
>> >> many such bugs. One such bug would be that the crosshair moves on its
>> >> own, without the mouse.
>> >
>> > I too find any movement of mouse cursor (and crosshair) which is not
>> > strictly mouse driven quite irritating.
>>
>> I like this behavior its weird at first but you quickly get the idea and
>> then it's useful, what I don't like is when the violation is off-screen it
>> doesn't take you there and you end up hitting refresh again (at least I
>> do).
>
> I have observed this bug with the standard Ubuntu PCB.
>
> It is very annoying that it does not take the cursor all the way to the
> error. The git head does not display this issue.

Are you talking about commit 31f2d454b34d2ad7bc93486c3bebddf5a1177c6c (or so)?

Are you talking about what happens when you click a DRC violation
entry while zoomed
in on one part of the board, when the violation is off-screen?
Because I still get the
bad behavior in that case: the cross-hair just gets clamped to the
edge of the screen.

Its both irritating to experienced users and much more of an
'intitivity' bug for new ones
because the cross-hair ends up hiding uselessly on edge of screen.
Does this happen
for you?

Britton

- Raw text -