X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
	:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=ruDJXKN5Z4Pbxh1Usp2kN77/EMuAHaWJXJ2a7p9jAnk=;
	b=FJ7R3LJhHlJEv7s+G6aAG/wvDUaBHlNRklGO75d6spTNSQDRKxo6S0IHDN1yil6VO0
	9MnCpI0bebGWiIVrek05KMgtUPMduVU+bIvdFR8KMOUEaZl0qWyEYpQtL2wzQtMOWLyG
	t7OR1RHQ/rIpxeFgBE5274IVVVd25PdLUNI4EUN6IM3owUILJJb3SZxa2LZbR8uH89OV
	ZRDXqyh+Giu0+N1juwCEBye37u0f2mfyEo31avkevCfIA9WO6PoSvewk1fJLg8hR0ii/
	t9ycEJwfgOi1b+ycHwStirZyYW44mvZjLZ6tqkyeKYUHBQlTIANn7GjbvZKeVqe0U9CR
	OYZw==
X-Received:	by 10.180.230.199 with SMTP id ta7mr4561722wic.1.1441905844251;
	Thu, 10 Sep 2015 10:24:04 -0700 (PDT)
Date:	Thu, 10 Sep 2015 19:23:59 +0200
From:	"Nicklas Karlsson (nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] zero soldermask clearance not caught by DRC
Message-Id:	<20150910192359.d048f0cc6fe9e76a123d2a05@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To:	<CAC4O8c_QpHmCw_uUoQ_yEfM_PG1-2Hsj=qx6MOoXeNjHO9o25g@mail.gmail.com>
References:	<55F1640D DOT 5080703 AT envinsci DOT co DOT uk>
	<55F17B4F DOT 30207 AT jump-ing DOT de>
	<20150910131034 DOT 32423 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se>
	<CAC4O8c_QpHmCw_uUoQ_yEfM_PG1-2Hsj=qx6MOoXeNjHO9o25g AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
X-Mailer:	Sylpheed 3.5.0beta1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Thu, 10 Sep 2015 09:05:53 -0800
"Britton Kerin (britton DOT kerin AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote:

> On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 5:10 AM, Peter Stuge (peter AT stuge DOT se) [via
> geda-user AT delorie DOT com] <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
> > Markus Hitter (mah AT jump-ing DOT de) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
> >> > Are shorted nets detectable by some other means?
> >>
> >> Shorts are detected when optimizing rats.
> >
> > That's, case in point, not very intuitive.
> >
> >
> >> DRC does just DRC, not connection checking.
> >
> > It could and should check connections too.
> >
> > I often find myself running DRC and optimizing rats (only to check
> > connections!) together, it makes perfect sense to make connection
> > checking part of DRC, either in addition to, or maybe instead of,
> > rat optimization.
> 
> I vote for both places.  One expects DRC to catch it, so it should be
> there.  Rat optimization catches it now, so its a free good feature: it
> puts detection of the bug closest to point where it's created which
> generally makes bug cheaper to fix.
> 

I also agree but do not know if anybody care about my oppinion.

- Raw text -