X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=mail.ud03.udmedia.de; h=
	subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:mime-version
	:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=beta; bh=
	7ZyZrvZJSZ4PbWkd6C09ZJbhX3J2Y7faVM0gMMka6G8=; b=UuLcJbzRM6e+WwNd
	ANQZoVrwsH0RKVkwuk5ztUY4AeEa3JRm2rwMMCXcsZmkVkEtccaL+DVzA8mdktGc
	4y8QmCLMIuvGKDZnd6Pxo6NiGnNLtkZX7UC8kg/M1wEjnjrr1yEyd2xwZ+VspxoJ
	HWCyHool2wTew/uaM7E5MZq7lFg=
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Desired changes
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
References:	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 11 DOT 1509031356150 DOT 13201 AT nimbus>
	<55E8773B DOT 9000902 AT jump-ing DOT de> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 11 DOT 1509031846370 DOT 7163 AT nimbus>
	<55E8831A DOT 8050307 AT jump-ing DOT de> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 11 DOT 1509032004020 DOT 10628 AT nimbus>
	<55E891FA DOT 2010509 AT jump-ing DOT de> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 11 DOT 1509032039300 DOT 14871 AT nimbus>
	<BC7E3E69-4914-4654-B020-1338C71E0CDB AT noqsi DOT com>
	<201509032030 DOT t83KU1Yq017045 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <55E97A3E DOT 2070402 AT jump-ing DOT de>
	<69B8B3F4-A6E4-43E9-9055-C63A5D6A3707 AT noqsi DOT com> <msfjma$340$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1509060518220 DOT 6924 AT igor2priv> <msidqe$66h$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org>
	<CAOuGh8-U2Eu3n-PZiCAd6R-aQD-N4s1Bd9-O2CJq7MjZBKkvHQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<55F1890F DOT 4090705 AT ecosensory DOT com> <55F18CCC DOT 7050404 AT jump-ing DOT de>
	<mssbd6$i3i$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org>
From:	"Markus Hitter (mah AT jump-ing DOT de) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
Message-ID:	<55F1B518.8020002@jump-ing.de>
Date:	Thu, 10 Sep 2015 18:51:36 +0200
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101
	Thunderbird/38.2.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<mssbd6$i3i$1@ger.gmane.org>
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

Am 10.09.2015 um 18:33 schrieb Kai-Martin Knaak:
> Is the general idea of the patch solid? Or should it be dismissed because 
> of some severe flaw?

The answer to this is something which would have to be found out.

- Does the patch still reasonably apply?

- What's the concept?

- How well does it work in realworld cases?

- Would following this concept lead onto a wrong track, making more
sane, future proof improvements more difficult?

- How compatible is it to files saved with previous versions?


Markus

-- 
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Dipl. Ing. (FH) Markus Hitter
http://www.jump-ing.de/

- Raw text -