X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
	:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=FqMR7NT2oaYtpUnW7DHznjqPNIazTFV/bDEl5O7gVUc=;
	b=HkezxcwCq9zqKOmXuzuKHkkCBh3DJ8finUvatcBgnmjHqS3L9whWem6mveD3hiTTec
	9x+BmTGeVVsYEw9XyOG4sm5fBpSyKqGlNktcPWeZcFzoV92+BYlGFRmsdXSR97Wz1Ap3
	EDmnW0l78GxvJ3iDddCWuMqVPelGmcBOMAxvK/Z0gkG7Vpnbr/B3ZQGbf6GrFHXZLJaS
	Fo1sIfzUTyPTr3xOJYqky7rPfb/n5IaAX/1YdYvzHRb4lyY17wlKDLGoGOL54Xs3lwfP
	JOBPZBqp6+WFfeixYzXXKTk4sjXpcrTyJ3RETtosLQsblmMO8rlHBt/8vBein6R5PTHK
	/FzA==
X-Received:	by 10.180.8.200 with SMTP id t8mr58996187wia.34.1441826423805;
	Wed, 09 Sep 2015 12:20:23 -0700 (PDT)
Date:	Wed, 9 Sep 2015 21:20:22 +0200
From:	"Nicklas Karlsson (nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] New experimental netlist features
Message-Id:	<20150909212022.e0d7ed9a6eac110f71c1787c@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To:	<201509091721.t89HL4iS020376@envy.delorie.com>
References:	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 11 DOT 1509031356150 DOT 13201 AT nimbus>
	<msi77b$6rr$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1509082036590 DOT 3066 AT lichen>
	<20150908233235 DOT b6cde3ec6c40bf235a7a1df8 AT gmail DOT com>
	<201509082144 DOT t88LiOXW007712 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<DUB125-W30B605E4BCBF749E33087DC6530 AT phx DOT gbl>
	<201509082355 DOT t88NtdSM012317 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1509091133300 DOT 2682 AT lichen>
	<201509091721 DOT t89HL4iS020376 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
X-Mailer:	Sylpheed 3.5.0beta1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Wed, 9 Sep 2015 13:21:04 -0400
DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com> wrote:

> 
> > Do you have any suggestion for a less ambiguous syntax?
> 
> We resolve ambiguity by documenting what we expect.
> 
> The question is, which syntax makes the most sense for us - what would
> present the "least surprise" to the user?
> 
> I think in this case, choosing between:
> 
> * Pascal
> * Ada
> * An obscure GCC extension[*]
> * Verilog
* VHDL

- Raw text -