X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
	:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=QByjZRI7jp2SIIFjiwQtok4R7xX2CsdaWa1QVlYlw/o=;
	b=yfAadeMUHBRckHLa+xSP4KbjbA92JbiJjj0gsRSiy4XMuzeqFVgaHwoG4kMb/DnRHv
	S2NkT8squd4I55IPCun2jm/BnfM/4rnE6VGjAdo5t66YPV01Iy/l69oiwUSY2BZw7uWx
	6Cz1gKkZOXaWhk5D/n/okxQGMGqgOzaQ898OlTr9pl3JORsUVUjO0FHC6XgAbQdOEF4G
	aY0DG6V1eFCyiwgJYTBGnwpqr3IeiqdoH6lPZ4tRzXwatbLrttVA8fUgHaDQJ0FYJT2m
	NFeg7YzRCULBWdXydq9lgeXm2mdceyi+qI7pHCqHwMy7yDB16rQDxAkJzWBK4nDTN3J9
	xAkg==
X-Received:	by 10.195.13.5 with SMTP id eu5mr4652821wjd.135.1441816015481;
	Wed, 09 Sep 2015 09:26:55 -0700 (PDT)
Date:	Wed, 9 Sep 2015 18:26:54 +0200
From:	"Nicklas Karlsson (nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] New experimental netlist features
Message-Id:	<20150909182654.50f1b4901afad3b863c3b754@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To:	<EA4D92E5-7674-49D8-911E-1318E2F1CEF1@sbcglobal.net>
References:	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 11 DOT 1509031356150 DOT 13201 AT nimbus>
	<msi77b$6rr$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1509082036590 DOT 3066 AT lichen>
	<201509082040 DOT t88KerD6005455 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<EA4D92E5-7674-49D8-911E-1318E2F1CEF1 AT sbcglobal DOT net>
X-Mailer:	Sylpheed 3.5.0beta1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> > No reason to not support a list/range in pinnumber= (or pinlabel=)
> > though.
> > 
> > pinnumber=5,6,8,9
> > 
> > the netlister could match that up with netname=D[0..3]
> 
> Would this proposed feature also work for connecting a single pin to multiple pads? For example, could three pin symbols for transistors work with devices that have four pads? It would be nice to support all the relationships:
> 
> - one to one
> - one to many (3 pin symbol transistor with a 4 pad footprint)
> - many to one (pass thru pins)
> - many to many

Components with several ground pins are very common.

- Raw text -