X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sbcglobal.net; s=s2048; t=1441811064; bh=A8X9sbcYOnxCcL4bqE8TC9TxD+SC+0glmsx+6d00VU4=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:References:To:From:Subject; b=FYt0Z7+e1ljSnUfrTC+ixCrPmcgioeQUnajSjvplZzVV8SXVYe+JxR+tK0tgMrcPE0cSp0TnPz+lWd3WQtuoERUiOSZBuPPkrz77a+w+JYxqg6A0ihV9k9CoOBDzOCyitb+WhMLPD7M7Q8dTP2mUgKNhx+rcN7YDTs66PWj2oSyKcxQPj7xaQYYgCD0Z1suJ2tPvj38tj6B0tAA4v2/MDnORbs76EYG3WNs62ExyF3ALj/tjywg7zToy2Fo7i1Q915cM60NHyJPInR9M6RzrNL3Bbl+01wsa60Ow7F3AZY4m8qi2nTVF+OqsV7OwKRs5ZV87vJC56Pi72BIy8Ow4ZQ==
X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:	992475 DOT 55209 DOT bm AT smtp207 DOT mail DOT gq1 DOT yahoo DOT com
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:	ymail-3
X-YMail-OSG:	bKUE.nYVM1mYDERlYPHEDxoyq6sxZaAJ_qKzK5PRscusz8W
	QaiKo7WMSeBjx9wGp7Y_.707NFh0V4wOYg8P2OopOfqQ8_A6GrUYAdI29b5S
	B6ejTD70hztmbC0VhTXBUz5cp9ZDMjZvhIAwdyA5N2WLJ0JXtBdKHvEZTz80
	P3fJAnBj4wVWNxXXNbS6L0_2XiDDZ_ftH_cUwiIj9jLQ7NqL8zf2fyvI434P
	KRICr7Rc_63XA_6erSHW3QbKl3v0tluPiGSKR6wcA81FNx.gbRXXd3t3kBAN
	WDX_z1qJvBhnX6U3B0zYTDuhEPyqih4UwiQCxgvfM7PQBHdUP1MtqW02LVVK
	SpJdTN2.RYsS300xW.N3eLBqc4Zl.sUzikxqJH1PwnnrsSvIuurgihDjZq93
	rzzJROtyQmMUFnr5StG.Bx2uQUW5_nyYL5M_hby5WV2FvZTHPU6Ugv8GXSKY
	UvrMKi0DF2o7i_LhyW49szZ7cvh2PRdDUsWcf43xx1jT1fK0gIs4FpCjKq1v
	2H6FjcEG1NRN7diffrMGiabLL.9BO2IY1.kl6h6SrBc4VMNPYWGg-
X-Yahoo-SMTP:	b8jVkbOswBAqZ4BhECp7nxPJUfTGEnEGv_G4qgQeZMeAbA--
Mime-Version:	1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\))
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] New experimental netlist features
From:	"Edward Hennessy (ehennes AT sbcglobal DOT net) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
In-Reply-To:	<201509082040.t88KerD6005455@envy.delorie.com>
Date:	Wed, 9 Sep 2015 08:04:23 -0700
Message-Id:	<EA4D92E5-7674-49D8-911E-1318E2F1CEF1@sbcglobal.net>
References:	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 11 DOT 1509031356150 DOT 13201 AT nimbus> <msi77b$6rr$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1509082036590 DOT 3066 AT lichen> <201509082040 DOT t88KerD6005455 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
To:	"geda-user AT delorie DOT com" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
X-Mailer:	Apple Mail (2.2104)
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id t89F4Smf014682
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> On Sep 8, 2015, at 1:40 PM, DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
> 
> No reason to not support a list/range in pinnumber= (or pinlabel=)
> though.
> 
> pinnumber=5,6,8,9
> 
> the netlister could match that up with netname=D[0..3]

Would this proposed feature also work for connecting a single pin to multiple pads? For example, could three pin symbols for transistors work with devices that have four pads? It would be nice to support all the relationships:

- one to one
- one to many (3 pin symbol transistor with a 4 pad footprint)
- many to one (pass thru pins)
- many to many

Pass thru pins could make the symbols for parts where the signal passes straight through easier to work with. For example, TVS diode pairs, feed thru capacitors, and transistors used in current mirrors.

Ed

- Raw text -