www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f |
Date: | Tue, 8 Sep 2015 17:44:24 -0400 |
Message-Id: | <201509082144.t88LiOXW007712@envy.delorie.com> |
From: | DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com> |
To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
In-reply-to: | <20150908233235.b6cde3ec6c40bf235a7a1df8@gmail.com> |
(geda-user AT delorie DOT com) | |
Subject: | Re: [geda-user] New experimental netlist features |
References: | <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 11 DOT 1509031356150 DOT 13201 AT nimbus> |
<msi77b$6rr$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org> | |
<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1509082036590 DOT 3066 AT lichen> <20150908233235 DOT b6cde3ec6c40bf235a7a1df8 AT gmail DOT com> | |
Reply-To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
> For C/C++ switch case "0 ... 7" could be used for ranges I think that's a GNU extension, though, and C and C++ differed in syntax. Not sure if they resolved that (let's hope so). In verilog, isn't the :N syntax used to denote the signal's *width* ? I.e. 0:8 would be the lower byte, 8:8 would be the upper byte, etc. If so, using the same syntax for a different meaning might confuse people.
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |