X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
	:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=W82IoYUR7BA0dn21635jziYTI2v/T4Co+o1yo3+powM=;
	b=G+gRpe1VGXLO8e5zQL0W6DYt/FfEvt52ukc1PnCTUke3mOUlz4TlgKfOIgUooeEa0W
	dXrnPTNUDJm+5OcbdzyCNttegJoMh3HDJ0Jhuvu6MbMQ0tm2x+rS5LrMu2qBtQQ0vfOK
	Lt2999ndrNjEk7VJzCf7RnWTN2fMmUn3kVNVsS5fg92ADxGe9X58gm73pD3J+uU/orG8
	3RnJjGzLhDVQlMh7A3vgYOdF0qc1NgmJ0sUfcHWgYoS65Fox629KeAt3wNPU6l0sqyOX
	nRo//adpcUvb9b1V7qnCMAx/sRkmnZ+vZTK2/5Gypx7+hZskS0Adnm/sZNvyjQLrIjXO
	059w==
X-Received:	by 10.180.92.225 with SMTP id cp1mr49058557wib.2.1441747957415;
	Tue, 08 Sep 2015 14:32:37 -0700 (PDT)
Date:	Tue, 8 Sep 2015 23:32:35 +0200
From:	"Nicklas Karlsson (nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] New experimental netlist features
Message-Id:	<20150908233235.b6cde3ec6c40bf235a7a1df8@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To:	<alpine.DEB.2.00.1509082036590.3066@lichen>
References:	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 11 DOT 1509031356150 DOT 13201 AT nimbus>
	<msi77b$6rr$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1509082036590 DOT 3066 AT lichen>
X-Mailer:	Sylpheed 3.5.0beta1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Tue, 8 Sep 2015 22:21:15 +0200 (CEST)
Roland Lutz <rlutz AT hedmen DOT org> wrote:

> On Sun, 6 Sep 2015, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
> >> Pin ranges can be denoted by either ".." or ":"; when using the latter 
> >> notation, the last pin isn't included in the list.
> >
> > what is the benefit of the ":"-format?
> 
> I'm not a fan of notations where the first and last included element are 
> mentioned; but I realize some users might want to use such a format, so I 
> allowed typing "0..7" instead of "0:8".

For C/C++ switch case "0 ... 7" could be used for ranges and for ADA "0 .. 7" could be used for ranges. I think "0..7" is great!

- Raw text -