X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Message-ID:	<1441650947.8030.18.camel@oscopy.org>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] New experimental netlist features
From:	Arnaud Gardelein <arnaud AT oscopy DOT org>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Date:	Mon, 07 Sep 2015 20:35:47 +0200
In-Reply-To:	<20150906073953.GB2637@localhost.localdomain>
References:	<55E97A3E DOT 2070402 AT jump-ing DOT de>
	<69B8B3F4-A6E4-43E9-9055-C63A5D6A3707 AT noqsi DOT com>
	<CAM2RGhT=aTYjyHWuxYFJXac8VhTOcB_piEGhq2dCNa61gAtFNw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<55E9BD63 DOT 8070407 AT jump-ing DOT de>
	<F6F6D986-713A-443E-B8FC-C6F7828C570D AT noqsi DOT com>
	<201509051930 DOT t85JUlTh019874 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<20150905210158 DOT GC7185 AT localhost DOT localdomain>
	<201509052107 DOT t85L7sHL024299 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<20150905213959 DOT GE7185 AT localhost DOT localdomain>
	<CAM2RGhSqfe4=EsyrpVhhUAc=jPadhmirG03zxPE4954A-VB=uQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<20150906073953 DOT GB2637 AT localhost DOT localdomain>
X-Mailer:	Evolution 3.12.9-1+b1
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id t87IZuPZ007743
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

Le dimanche 06 septembre 2015 à 10:39 +0300, Vladimir Zhbanov
(vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] a écrit :
> On Sat, Sep 05, 2015 at 11:35:49PM +0000, Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
> ...
> > You have my agreement until you get to scheme. Irrespective of
> > technical attracting new developers is harder when you are using a
> > language that is itself falling in popularity. It is just another
> > barrier to entry for new contributors. Most people already know C
> > almost no one comes to this project already knowing scheme.
> Some fifteen years ago, in my DOS/Windows life, nobody around me
> programmed in C. What I saw were Pascal/Delphy, various Basic's and
> Assemblers. After moving on Linux, I found C is everywhere, beginning
> from kernel. Again, around me Unix/Linux is a marginal stuff.
> > 
> > Even John Dotty seemed to agree that we need an alternative to scheme.
> Yes, yes, I could even agree ;) But not two parallel versions with new
> dependencies in one repository. How to support them? How to support
> cross-compiling in this case? There is another way. Let's make bindings
> for various languages since gobject model allows this. Let's introduce
> plugins/modules, and we already have modules in scheme.
> 
I would support such proposal, i.e. to have add an alternative to scheme
while supporting it. And providing bindings is a fair approach. This is
one of the strength of popular projects such as gnome, kde, etc.
Reading all the thread I was not able to see whether someone discussed
on the available libraries. For example languages like perl or python
propose a _lot_ of functionalities (numerical computing, web access,
etc.). Could this be considered in the choice of any other new
language ?

Arnaud.

- Raw text -