X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references
	:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to
	:user-agent;
	bh=QeYG4k49LoRQfxK4NrARZLuObypsa5Y3FsVGT3Xg//g=;
	b=Yk8LWH18F+OJaTl6Z005guO+anJU/T8uZxPoNyIefMAjeP7t1MM4p07FnVbsJlcwQq
	9QQcTZhMXE4VFsDo7Q4zveUkCZobOlUZmXqlAc/UbybDS9iEobQbgtf2mmRc5/woAobO
	0vlun5cgzupfbfchgNbf8eyMOz6aSvr1ywzLJR07P5izYGGoq6jFevg20lQEv+kBqLz3
	N5fFV6levI/F3cxm1KIJlOO6R9OOLGk0iyLN90EG1DM42jrBe30fxLv/lldvvmh2Vt1m
	9sxE6y9rfKH9JYVqmcG5GgcAnJwptYRUZNDYou/NXRH6+JUACvYtssk9GNZKrUhY3/W4
	+qvQ==
X-Received:	by 10.112.150.3 with SMTP id ue3mr11754592lbb.51.1441528319344;
	Sun, 06 Sep 2015 01:31:59 -0700 (PDT)
Date:	Sun, 6 Sep 2015 11:31:57 +0300
From:	"Vladimir Zhbanov (vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] New experimental netlist features
Message-ID:	<20150906083156.GD2637@localhost.localdomain>
Mail-Followup-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
References:	<55E97A3E DOT 2070402 AT jump-ing DOT de>
	<69B8B3F4-A6E4-43E9-9055-C63A5D6A3707 AT noqsi DOT com>
	<CAM2RGhT=aTYjyHWuxYFJXac8VhTOcB_piEGhq2dCNa61gAtFNw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<55E9BD63 DOT 8070407 AT jump-ing DOT de>
	<F6F6D986-713A-443E-B8FC-C6F7828C570D AT noqsi DOT com>
	<201509051930 DOT t85JUlTh019874 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<20150905210158 DOT GC7185 AT localhost DOT localdomain>
	<201509052107 DOT t85L7sHL024299 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<20150905213959 DOT GE7185 AT localhost DOT localdomain>
	<CAC4O8c_a1mquPewmT9JzFypPBdZZ6PyOqu=2WU5SmfYN1Pj+WA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<CAC4O8c_a1mquPewmT9JzFypPBdZZ6PyOqu=2WU5SmfYN1Pj+WA@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Sat, Sep 05, 2015 at 04:27:35PM -0800, Britton Kerin (britton DOT kerin AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
...
> Or you'll become vim, the most successful editor by far.  It was a
> gigantic relief to stop fighting with elisp and use perl (that I know best).
I like vim too. Though emacs is more popular among programmers. From my
point of view this is because it has many extensions and docs which do
not force users to write something themselves.

> 
> If we had the topo router going in Ruby that would be lovely, and it
> wouldn't have to interact with anything else to be useful.
8-O Spherical topo router in vacuum?
> 
> > If you support Perl, Ruby, Python, and Scheme, you will certainly find
> > Python and Perl fans who are using your application constantly at each
> > others' throats, re-implementing the same 'script' functionality 8 or 9
> > times, and generally wasting time that could be better spent enhancing
> > their plug-in packages.
> 
> If all these discussions show anything at all, it's that people are not going
> to agree which features are most important or how exactly they should
> work.  It's because their needs are too dramatically different.  Therefore,
> there's much less waste in having scripts with overlap than you think.
Please see, those are not my words. Just a quote.
Agreed with the statement that needs differ. Disagreed with all other.
First things I tried to do with gschem files to automate some things
were vim scripts (and vim highlighting), shell scripts, sed scripts, awk
scripts, python scripts (rewrite of tragesym for my needs), makefiles,
probably some other stuff. This continued until I found the geda-scheme
info and gaf and ways I can quickly do simple things without needing all
the above. I've planned to start with a new document in the wiki to
publish some excerpts, but now I spend time on this discussions to
protect Scheme in order not to lose motivation to do anything further.

> 
> In any case, we have no one in a position to mandate any particular
And this is wrong. 'Real democracy' (anarchy) :(
Things get worse and worse since Ales has given up (or he has been
forced to).

We definitely need a project leader (as other projects have) who could
pronounce his/her sentence about all our arguments and about the
short term goals we are going to achieve. 

> language.  Forks are overtaking main-line already.  We'd do better to
> try to ensure that all the scripts make it into the distribution somehow
> in such a way that people can find them.
Or analogous functionality, at least.

Cheers,
  Vladimir

- Raw text -