X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references
	:mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to
	:user-agent;
	bh=/y7LGDKaNBY8/a5TEcf71goHRMKBilgl7VJSGo95vjQ=;
	b=QDGD/Rc0rfMgRXvzgldP6N14vXqzrjM3rTKW9XfOChh2EpbCRep+/prBSl1LlGQvaM
	sNjx1OnnbVVBLVmO0BtAQvCuwcFYo533ZUla3SSb7gWtvBhmSCutGC1xcM65iWXp5fIi
	0AWWRlQPeTqGZ9tc7bVdxa4KbiErFDY6lHRCg0Ko//5iLz3/6Gy7KhlxZIkYHjLUD61T
	/Cpg8KXbA6Awkmvurcn7tu3ZFR0TSBg8fgEsl3D1TDkUa2T8REgLESRLxDMLJf0ud6Ad
	wR8w1GZZ+iXT0/feR69Tk0kKF723XMAHuJ29ASjChDojFWPNMsEA94TA2qokZPM+lrfb
	e9vw==
X-Received:	by 10.152.5.135 with SMTP id s7mr9898661las.75.1441486921061;
	Sat, 05 Sep 2015 14:02:01 -0700 (PDT)
Date:	Sun, 6 Sep 2015 00:01:58 +0300
From:	"Vladimir Zhbanov (vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] New experimental netlist features
Message-ID:	<20150905210158.GC7185@localhost.localdomain>
Mail-Followup-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
References:	<55E891FA DOT 2010509 AT jump-ing DOT de>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 11 DOT 1509032039300 DOT 14871 AT nimbus>
	<BC7E3E69-4914-4654-B020-1338C71E0CDB AT noqsi DOT com>
	<201509032030 DOT t83KU1Yq017045 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<55E97A3E DOT 2070402 AT jump-ing DOT de>
	<69B8B3F4-A6E4-43E9-9055-C63A5D6A3707 AT noqsi DOT com>
	<CAM2RGhT=aTYjyHWuxYFJXac8VhTOcB_piEGhq2dCNa61gAtFNw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<55E9BD63 DOT 8070407 AT jump-ing DOT de>
	<F6F6D986-713A-443E-B8FC-C6F7828C570D AT noqsi DOT com>
	<201509051930 DOT t85JUlTh019874 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
MIME-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<201509051930.t85JUlTh019874@envy.delorie.com>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Sat, Sep 05, 2015 at 03:30:47PM -0400, DJ Delorie wrote:
> 
> > No, gEDA has to emphasize its strengths to avoid losing to KiCAD.
> 
> gEDA has already lost to KiCad.

I've read a post of a user trying hard to find appropriate open-source
solution for his work, and he was frustrated that KiCAD's schematic
capture program is not gschem, and that gEDA's pcb is not KiCAD's
pcbnew.

It's just an opinion. Tastes may vary.

Cheers,
  Vladimir

P.S. Sorry, I cannot but tell you that such your expressions are like
John Doty's ones you've cursed before. They discourage users from
looking at the project, and developers from working on it.

P.P.S. I'm emerging here as an opponent to you, Roland, John Doty,
Kay-Martin and all others, who discourages users from trying to use new
Scheme script possibilities Peter Brett have added to the project, even
looking at them. I begin to get tired and understand now, why Peter has
no motivation. No any positive feedback. Only new demands. Hey, does
anybody tried to package the geda-gaf version on Windows I've built a
while ago? I think no, only complaints, it was so unhappy to use 1.8.2
(which only version open-source Debian has exactly as well).

P.P.P.S. I don't want to start any flamewar, sorry, just could not
resist...

- Raw text -