www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f |
Date: | Sat, 5 Sep 2015 15:20:56 -0400 |
Message-Id: | <201509051920.t85JKu1s019157@envy.delorie.com> |
From: | DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com> |
To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
In-reply-to: | <55E9BF77.5050402@jump-ing.de> (geda-user@delorie.com) |
Subject: | Re: [geda-user] GTS sources included vs. dependency on the GTS package |
References: | <55E9BF77 DOT 5050402 AT jump-ing DOT de> |
Reply-To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
> As this is a rather deep change, I'd like to hear your opinion. Is > it fine to remove a whole directory with sources and to depend on a > package instead? Such major changes need to be tested on more than just one OS. Fedora, Debian, and Ubuntu have different package sets and commands for installing/testing them, and Windows will certainly now need the user to build this "extra" package manually. Lots of documentation will need to be touched as users bump into this, build scripts for downstreams (rpm/deb spec files) will need to be edited, etc. Having said that, I'm a fan of not copying libraries :-)
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |