X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-TCPREMOTEIP:	207.224.51.38
X-Authenticated-UID:	jpd AT noqsi DOT com
Mime-Version:	1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] New experimental netlist features
From:	John Doty <jpd AT noqsi DOT com>
In-Reply-To:	<55E9BD63.8070407@jump-ing.de>
Date:	Fri, 4 Sep 2015 10:11:00 -0600
Message-Id:	<F6F6D986-713A-443E-B8FC-C6F7828C570D@noqsi.com>
References:	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 11 DOT 1509031356150 DOT 13201 AT nimbus> <55E8773B DOT 9000902 AT jump-ing DOT de> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 11 DOT 1509031846370 DOT 7163 AT nimbus> <55E8831A DOT 8050307 AT jump-ing DOT de> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 11 DOT 1509032004020 DOT 10628 AT nimbus> <55E891FA DOT 2010509 AT jump-ing DOT de> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 11 DOT 1509032039300 DOT 14871 AT nimbus> <BC7E3E69-4914-4654-B020-1338C71E0CDB AT noqsi DOT com> <201509032030 DOT t83KU1Yq017045 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <55E97A3E DOT 2070402 AT jump-ing DOT de> <69B8B3F4-A6E4-43E9-9055-C63A5D6A3707 AT noqsi DOT com> <CAM2RGhT=aTYjyHWuxYFJXac8VhTOcB_piEGhq2dCNa61gAtFNw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <55E9BD63 DOT 8070407 AT jump-ing DOT de>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailer:	Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id t84GBAlX013542
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Sep 4, 2015, at 9:48 AM, Markus Hitter (mah AT jump-ing DOT de) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote:

> Am 04.09.2015 um 17:30 schrieb Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via
> geda-user AT delorie DOT com]:
>> Users should have a choice between
>> 1. kicad, a GUI centric integrated tool that has limited workflows but
>> intuitive control
> 
> OK, gEDA has to be intentionally hard to use to not dent into KiCAd
> business.

No, gEDA has to emphasize its strengths to avoid losing to KiCAD. Trying to compete with KiCAD is folly. We can do so many things they can’t, but a limited tool will always beat a flexible kit at integration.

John Doty              Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd.
http://www.noqsi.com/
jpd AT noqsi DOT com

- Raw text -