X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Date:	Thu, 3 Sep 2015 19:05:30 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Roland Lutz <rlutz AT hedmen DOT org>
To:	"Markus Hitter (mah AT jump-ing DOT de) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] New experimental netlist features
In-Reply-To:	<55E8773B.9000902@jump-ing.de>
Message-ID:	<alpine.DEB.2.11.1509031846370.7163@nimbus>
References:	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 11 DOT 1509031356150 DOT 13201 AT nimbus> <55E8773B DOT 9000902 AT jump-ing DOT de>
User-Agent:	Alpine 2.11 (DEB 23 2013-08-11)
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Thu, 3 Sep 2015, Markus Hitter (mah AT jump-ing DOT de) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
> The question of all questions is, when can Xorn enter gEDA and replace 
> gnetlist, isn't it?

The only thing which is missing right now is a Scheme wrapper which 
executes the gafrc and gnetlistrc configuration files, reads geda.conf, 
and passes the appropriate command-line flags to the netlister.

> The netlister is one of the parts which should "just work", behind the 
> user visible scenes, so I don't think it's neccessary it comes with 
> every single feature the precedessor has.

But even better, it does!  It's basically the same code, so (except for 
the inevitable bugs) there should only be some minor, well-documented 
differences.

> In fact it may be a good opportunity to get rid of some old cruft.

What in particular do you consider worth getting rid of?

Roland

- Raw text -