X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=IGMraZ3oAhONT65MxhgjFfOoA3vlf+Tg6NXyrPCzeiE=;
	b=h8VdDRhXekW1fw60cbC9PmoZYMDXv+jPDa9QIMyxGBFG4UYzs9O/z35g1h2x1yjo0Y
	OdN3YzpxIGO7XRM4vCQtX9vw02Ds86zaQOu6RNprtlnszcTvtjyqqWdmj7nAikci2zsR
	mIG9byo3avSj4vcArEMqxNPqL87qmHCBN2/BbIk9wtMTA/b3hJHfnia3KVmQ8Rscoak8
	XyERGz4lgrHE7PLKuxbs0NgipnA1mQiYZvLd1cIekmx3oBlMsjRduHvLDtqHgRB2UJzj
	5c6WaULWP78n28M27My8+V15odFWIT6EKyqD8Q0NjfFZ975ily2jlQ3NmxX9bRp87Qry
	DXBQ==
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Received:	by 10.112.64.7 with SMTP id k7mr13457782lbs.31.1441158635948; Tue,
	01 Sep 2015 18:50:35 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To:	<55E64B10.1060007@jump-ing.de>
References:	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1509010447310 DOT 6924 AT igor2priv>
	<CAM2RGhRxevpXzeQpOV-OMtRhofjeSQxMkr0iFsutZ0a2EX9rcQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1509010743560 DOT 6924 AT igor2priv>
	<CAM2RGhSs=o0OT9AcWp9rfd=MRRxT3r5uyDa6VBcT66fXkEituw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<55E5A6BA DOT 4030606 AT jump-ing DOT de>
	<201509011657 DOT t81Gve9d017777 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<1441151947 DOT 12067 DOT 57 DOT camel AT benjamin-hp-g70>
	<55E64B10 DOT 1060007 AT jump-ing DOT de>
Date:	Wed, 2 Sep 2015 01:50:35 +0000
Message-ID:	<CAM2RGhTth7i=XF6+b5OqTtDArPz0dYoQr=3bkRQC-i1XN7e4kg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] gCode output
From:	"Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id t821ohBT005731
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 1:04 AM, Markus Hitter (mah AT jump-ing DOT de) [via
geda-user AT delorie DOT com] <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
> Am 02.09.2015 um 01:59 schrieb Benjamin L. Naber:
>> So I'm curious, under what standard was the gCode generator built?
>
> To the standard of a LinuxCNC controlled machine as well as to a Teacup Firmware driven one. There's a checkbox at the bottom of the dialog to switch between these two. These two choices cover a wide range of milling machines.

LinuxCNC formerly EMC (enhanced machine controller) was originally a
NIST project to produce a standard test platform for compliance with
the g code standard.

>> Having experimented with a handful of EDA gcode generators, every single
>> one outputs a different style of gcode. And, too add to this mess, every
>> single CAM and machine controller responds differently to gcode styles.
>>
>> This is very annoying.
>>
>> I also notice that no one sticks to a standard of something such as
>> turning on a spindle, specifying speed, and so on.
>
> The trick is to read a machine's manual and to adjust a given G-code program to match what's written there. If you find this annoying, such a machine and this software is not for you.
>
>> ... yet another damn program in the toolchain to generate a PCB
>> from a pretty picture on the screen?
>
> When you're positive to stop yelling and whining and invest some time to find a solution for your case you can try again. I won't defend software which is the result of hundreds of hours of my work and which I provide for free. Maybe you had more respect if I'd ask for $ 5'000 for your download.


+1

> Markus
>
> --
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> Dipl. Ing. (FH) Markus Hitter
> http://www.jump-ing.de/



-- 
Home
http://evanfoss.googlepages.com/
Work
http://forge.abcd.harvard.edu/gf/project/epl_engineering/wiki/

- Raw text -