X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Authority-Analysis:	v=2.1 cv=EbVbHpWC c=1 sm=1 tr=0
	a=i8YFXPki89RvEvq+B+HWeA==:117 a=i8YFXPki89RvEvq+B+HWeA==:17 a=cNaOj0WVAAAA:8
	a=f5113yIGAAAA:8 a=aAv4vi-RAAAA:8 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=5pVicJ2oshIA:10
	a=DCEbKqzIfaIA:10 a=ff-B7xzCdYMA:10 a=Mj1Xp5F7AAAA:8 a=gkUrVpaLVoGw29Ast5EA:9
	a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=project23d.com; s=default;
	h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Mime-Version:Content-Type:References:In-Reply-To:Date:To:From:Subject:Message-ID; bh=PMV1rVNZFVYPJ6WBW6ysadVbeIenHqmH4dqqsVSEo1k=;
	b=nKlrlrNxm6ZDuMZw5Cg+2intO7Onf4WO2kjpVaRS94uRZoA86O2FMGyst/yPKTet+1588BWkQ6f9lHIiGhkiFOqGs+kXQPcL9ImAobL3AfsOXkrmgv01xTxkzqbF/sVxiJA/6Wqn6hUAIcxJaquBzgqnxVg376GqgbXC2XBmjTQ=;
Message-ID:	<1441158285.12067.59.camel@benjamin-hp-g70>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] gCode output
From:	"Benjamin L. Naber (benjamin AT project23d DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Date:	Tue, 01 Sep 2015 21:44:45 -0400
In-Reply-To:	<55E64B10.1060007@jump-ing.de>
References:	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1509010447310 DOT 6924 AT igor2priv>
	<CAM2RGhRxevpXzeQpOV-OMtRhofjeSQxMkr0iFsutZ0a2EX9rcQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1509010743560 DOT 6924 AT igor2priv>
	<CAM2RGhSs=o0OT9AcWp9rfd=MRRxT3r5uyDa6VBcT66fXkEituw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<55E5A6BA DOT 4030606 AT jump-ing DOT de>
	<201509011657 DOT t81Gve9d017777 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<1441151947 DOT 12067 DOT 57 DOT camel AT benjamin-hp-g70> <55E64B10 DOT 1060007 AT jump-ing DOT de>
Organization:	Project23 Development, Inc.
X-Mailer:	Evolution 3.10.4-0ubuntu2
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Identified-User:	{3464:box352.bluehost.com:projefc9:project23d.com} {sentby:smtp auth 24.96.95.173 authed with benjamin AT project23d DOT com}
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

Bottom of what dialog?


On Wed, 2015-09-02 at 03:04 +0200, Markus Hitter (mah AT jump-ing DOT de) [via
geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
> Am 02.09.2015 um 01:59 schrieb Benjamin L. Naber:
> > So I'm curious, under what standard was the gCode generator built?
> 
> To the standard of a LinuxCNC controlled machine as well as to a Teacup Firmware driven one. There's a checkbox at the bottom of the dialog to switch between these two. These two choices cover a wide range of milling machines.
> 
> > Having experimented with a handful of EDA gcode generators, every single
> > one outputs a different style of gcode. And, too add to this mess, every
> > single CAM and machine controller responds differently to gcode styles.
> > 
> > This is very annoying.
> > 
> > I also notice that no one sticks to a standard of something such as
> > turning on a spindle, specifying speed, and so on.
> 
> The trick is to read a machine's manual and to adjust a given G-code program to match what's written there. If you find this annoying, such a machine and this software is not for you.
> 
> > ... yet another damn program in the toolchain to generate a PCB
> > from a pretty picture on the screen?
> 
> When you're positive to stop yelling and whining and invest some time to find a solution for your case you can try again. I won't defend software which is the result of hundreds of hours of my work and which I provide for free. Maybe you had more respect if I'd ask for $ 5'000 for your download.
> 
> 
> Markus
> 

- Raw text -