X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Date:	Tue, 1 Sep 2015 19:17:13 +0200 (CEST)
X-X-Sender:	igor2 AT igor2priv
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Debug:	to=geda-user AT delorie DOT com from="gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu"
From:	gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] back annotation - phase 2, call for contributors
In-Reply-To:	<201509011657.t81Gve9d017777@envy.delorie.com>
Message-ID:	<alpine.DEB.2.00.1509011913530.6924@igor2priv>
References:	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1509010447310 DOT 6924 AT igor2priv> <CAM2RGhRxevpXzeQpOV-OMtRhofjeSQxMkr0iFsutZ0a2EX9rcQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1509010743560 DOT 6924 AT igor2priv> <CAM2RGhSs=o0OT9AcWp9rfd=MRRxT3r5uyDa6VBcT66fXkEituw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<55E5A6BA DOT 4030606 AT jump-ing DOT de> <201509011657 DOT t81Gve9d017777 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
User-Agent:	Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Tue, 1 Sep 2015, DJ Delorie wrote:

>
>> Do you want write access to the public repo? There you can commit to
>> a branch and stuff will be visible and easily pickable.
>>
>> To the other gEDA comitters: I hope you don't mind me offering this.
>
> I encourage folks to use the gedaproject repo unless there's a
> compelling reason not to.
>

For me, the important quesiton is whether the changes put in such a 
branch gets into the next release - or is left in a feature branch to bit 
rot.

So what do you, gschem maintainers, think about the gschem-related points 
of my proposal?

Regards,

Igor2

- Raw text -