X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
	:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=CScN7XV8o9a+ahzPSBloiOMdpoX8cC4Xf8EWNlV7oEA=;
	b=TI/8r7bAuUQ46uqoBm3IxL65gWSTdryFf6CbtZghmN5Ia0q6MiMBQ7GlC+/Vu6ZND7
	D0++ViaOCrvBRP5DILX00sad5a/3i8D2sUIgUb5jgaInMhYRe19Vp2UhJymYefbYGP1J
	7+GzP8JEIlGjeCRHSDzgMBurwhPCBvKSHXaaeh8yazSOFBsLW+b/20ueg2I16lVUMrv7
	/u9r85bCRhrBecM873RlDoZF6dZ23Ft24V8LztEF45/eH5JRSWuYGnHM8eUjhzocsugW
	DU8JId7YKySQdZHyl9VXadxlmYORN5DMvCxCB5bIInjnUuTqRExL91jTaLSgXW1bu/83
	rD0A==
X-Received:	by 10.180.187.170 with SMTP id ft10mr3797906wic.15.1441119221326;
	Tue, 01 Sep 2015 07:53:41 -0700 (PDT)
Date:	Tue, 1 Sep 2015 16:53:39 +0200
From:	"Nicklas Karlsson (nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] SQL PCB file format
Message-Id:	<20150901165339.850c50d9f3f5d5c87f58d27e@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To:	<CA+uY=MR7RO_3J6uRB34WTi5dbTB9fBAk2WebkJofZdA45VgcLw@mail.gmail.com>
References:	<20150826000523 DOT 353 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se>
	<CAM2RGhQi83=d+H6be6z6v7HkchdXqkfkiypKsQf0mM+QGdiH9A AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<55DDD4DB DOT 2060008 AT ecosensory DOT com>
	<20150826153031 DOT 4620 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se>
	<201508261807 DOT t7QI7sS3003191 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<20150826182552 DOT 22702 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se>
	<CAGYR9vci4fCsw05ryrV=NDNbyb6Ng1E3hyD3rF4TeBcdAaqhbg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<20150831140133 DOT 2dc0456c28430ebcfb0b17b5 AT gmail DOT com>
	<55E4471F DOT 3010906 AT jump-ing DOT de>
	<ms2s9b$rs6$2 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org>
	<20150901095807 DOT 17257 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se>
	<CA+uY=MR7RO_3J6uRB34WTi5dbTB9fBAk2WebkJofZdA45VgcLw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
X-Mailer:	Sylpheed 3.5.0beta1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

As I see it the text below is not about fileformat instead it is about refactor to extract the functions manipulating the file and put them in a separate library.


On Tue, 1 Sep 2015 10:23:39 -0400
"Russell Nelson (russnelson AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote:

> Indeed. PCB need not use the same interchange file format as it uses for
> its native storage. But I'm not quite seeing the difficulty with the
> existing file format. It's plain text, so easy to edit. It's well-known,
> with a bunch of tools that manipulate it. I would say to stick with it as
> both interchange and native storage.
> 
> On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 5:58 AM, Peter Stuge (peter AT stuge DOT se) [via
> geda-user AT delorie DOT com] <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
> 
> > Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
> > > >> read through source code and find all functions or similar
> > > >> accessing the PCB file and put them in libpcb library file which
> > > >> would be become a storage library.
> > > >
> > > > Pretty much all code accesses the stored data directly, no such
> > > > thing like accessors or setters/getters.
> > >
> > > Something whispers "refactor!" in my ear...
> >
> > Setters/getters are perhaps the worst side effect there is in source
> > code. Never introduce artificial overhead without very careful
> > consideration.
> >
> > Data structures in memory are intended to be accessed directly and
> > ideally never copied.
> >
> > Permanent storage is another matter. Setters/getters for files are
> > all the more appropriate - and that's exactly what libpcb and edacore
> > both would offer. I'm all for moving pcb file code into a libpcb.
> >
> >
> > //Peter
> >

- Raw text -