X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
	:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=4bTMb0wNp1RnHZOKvVJrETCx1D4JQCxSquDUNG+k7pI=;
	b=0If/ryxIOp1bXHdYEWQ/uyMhHyJSWGVECi0aWSMp6ZBkBnkHGaZw9YvqJfTDAcaKcG
	/yqM8INHULb+7mD72hdbb1NTnxvjbFXJHSPBWnxcWRpsMg3C4OsYa1trJNzxpK0i0Ppm
	IzfxlESh93YMz8RlooxlaMwqiddan/B5pGJaQY+TWQn+ru/PsMEMO0yjwOariVHX6QSG
	sAp863bZWGaVCqsIMjqYY6KAG72si6QuVmndc9Ph2g8TKYJiAWSzAC1IVYUfzZJvyczv
	4v6XtO9FcWT9+kO0t6i1RJH6ozelUlfo9KshmvJdRvDgaAcg1/H3q9s89GIFz5RxTDv7
	SxeQ==
X-Received:	by 10.194.191.164 with SMTP id gz4mr31221404wjc.21.1441087985928;
	Mon, 31 Aug 2015 23:13:05 -0700 (PDT)
Date:	Tue, 1 Sep 2015 08:13:04 +0200
From:	"Nicklas Karlsson (nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] back annotation proposal (RFC)
Message-Id:	<20150901081304.d5535533d1e47d9e76f8730f@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To:	<alpine.DEB.2.00.1509010411320.6924@igor2priv>
References:	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1508301838470 DOT 6924 AT igor2priv>
	<201508301802 DOT t7UI2twS031311 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<CAM2RGhRgPQG2WDFVb0SFvMbypyYKS2oYtD=851WHR6fOB4iWdA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<201508310341 DOT t7V3fcfh022966 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<CAM2RGhRcQKdYjR5mKDazQ-TouPK0ydkEgt05tscCcWQh4s0EDQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<20150831161636 DOT d99b3f330903ff90376250f2 AT gmail DOT com>
	<55E4715C DOT 6070007 AT ecosensory DOT com>
	<20150831215056 DOT ae0d389f0f00128331b8105c AT gmail DOT com>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1509010411320 DOT 6924 AT igor2priv>
X-Mailer:	Sylpheed 3.5.0beta1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

I am willing to offer code contribution as soon as I could get time and have worked for around 8 years as a professional developer.

To back annotate as is now or the difference is good enough if no one could figure a not to complicated method in case changes have been done both ways. I would probably do like this: if something new is added in the schematic it will be left as is now and only changes would be back annotated.

Regards Nicklas Karlsson



On Tue, 1 Sep 2015 04:12:34 +0200 (CEST)
gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu wrote:

> 
> 
> On Mon, 31 Aug 2015, Nicklas Karlsson (nicklas DOT karlsson17 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
> 
> > It might be to complicated to handle changes "from any direction" "at any time" during layout but to get stuck at a solution there manual handling in correct order is the only possible implementation is not good either.
> >
> > If there is no theoretical possibility to tell from a schematic <--> pcb pair in which file the change was done last operator must remember the direction and press the right direction button or as is now run some scripts.
> 
> Never wanted to solve that problem. Please read my proposal and my posts.
> 
> Btw, are you offering code contribution or ideas only?
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Igor2

- Raw text -