X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=QQ5jdh2pzOeMR5ne66QAJMcSmhkGt0Bt2wgC0fWehIc=;
	b=lz18mZd66TGLbi+F98raJZvf4uHKcKRtldzejFJmHitkw+9rr8Cce0MkB8cAi1qn+t
	gx4oHp3+LmL7GmkTUqCubX8TCgYhif4I1Oy3r4YqSAiKVlqLWnR1iNA2l0QEwXY56Rcf
	p3edwEMUaVKHef95Pr512epa1ea6AOSKom02+SG0IRpZYOMqawCHRuBqHcxYBsif5p2x
	R5rMPLoOOUlWJqO8r9vEcorja/KXbrrDFU4jGmZYL53vAHhHvrBmjxkcIlW1/XtvcJFK
	JTkCL8bnePZg791HrCdkbtIJY7PBrJzwT4CEAbhsecSTUTC8eUpyEaUWCSJUE2rhrMjv
	ocAQ==
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Received:	by 10.112.54.132 with SMTP id j4mr25883306lbp.84.1440514310522;
	Tue, 25 Aug 2015 07:51:50 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To:	<55DC78F8.1010105@iae.nl>
References:	<CAM2RGhTJ-gywb3LrkKoNKUxkwJCTsJ7vRxiLtmrXa5Mnp0331w AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<DUB125-W46D6798DBF674B80F24208C6620 AT phx DOT gbl>
	<6B8DDCCF-0E84-43DC-94A3-89CE0E56F0ED AT noqsi DOT com>
	<201508242052 DOT 28189 DOT ad252 AT freeelectron DOT net>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1508250534570 DOT 6924 AT igor2priv>
	<3766120C-93DD-454D-B2FA-7C79B78DC86C AT noqsi DOT com>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1508251403030 DOT 6924 AT igor2priv>
	<8DC5050C-49D2-49AD-94B0-A1FC857178E5 AT noqsi DOT com>
	<55DC6491 DOT 8030607 AT iae DOT nl>
	<3FA132D6-A8D9-47C8-8D37-E1962EF4098B AT noqsi DOT com>
	<55DC78F8 DOT 1010105 AT iae DOT nl>
Date:	Tue, 25 Aug 2015 10:51:49 -0400
Message-ID:	<CAM2RGhRYZ5Mxf8yUqsSmQ0Uzdb-4jc6-cSCKQ4kiMS6bOfEiHg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Re: off-topic: daydreaming about modularization
From:	"Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id t7PEpwFe025366
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 10:17 AM, myken <myken AT iae DOT nl> wrote:
> On 25/08/15 15:18, John Doty wrote:
>
> Isn't the whole idea in this thread "let's make gschem/pcb more accessible”?
>
> Yes, but the answer looks *completely* different depending on whether you’re
> coming from a pcb (integrated tool) or geda-gaf (toolkit) perspective.
>
>
> It must be my lack of understanding the English language but I don't think
> there is anyone on this list disputing the power, flexibility, simplicity
> and usability of the geda-gaf (gschem) toolkit. Well I don't.
> If I understand what I have read there is no one that wants to restrict the
> functionality of gschem.
> If anything I guess there is a bigger change that pcb will move towards
> gschem (geda) then the other way around.

The PCB developers are the current majority.

> All people try to do is find a way to make the combination more accessible.
> I don't mind adding the restriction "looking from the geda-gaf perspective",
> if that makes us move forward.

gschem needs a more viable plugin interface so that people can
implement their desired gschem and pcb relationship with out
subjecting the rest of us too it.

> Cheers, Robert.



-- 
Home
http://evanfoss.googlepages.com/
Work
http://forge.abcd.harvard.edu/gf/project/epl_engineering/wiki/

- Raw text -