X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-SourceIP:	95.97.163.245
X-Authenticated-Sender:	b DOT mykendevelopment AT upcmail DOT nl
Message-ID:	<55DC6491.8030607@iae.nl>
Date:	Tue, 25 Aug 2015 14:50:25 +0200
From:	myken <myken AT iae DOT nl>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	[geda-user] Re: off-topic: daydreaming about modularization
References:	<CAM2RGhTJ-gywb3LrkKoNKUxkwJCTsJ7vRxiLtmrXa5Mnp0331w AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <DUB125-W46D6798DBF674B80F24208C6620 AT phx DOT gbl> <6B8DDCCF-0E84-43DC-94A3-89CE0E56F0ED AT noqsi DOT com> <201508242052 DOT 28189 DOT ad252 AT freeelectron DOT net> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1508250534570 DOT 6924 AT igor2priv> <3766120C-93DD-454D-B2FA-7C79B78DC86C AT noqsi DOT com> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1508251403030 DOT 6924 AT igor2priv> <8DC5050C-49D2-49AD-94B0-A1FC857178E5 AT noqsi DOT com>
In-Reply-To:	<8DC5050C-49D2-49AD-94B0-A1FC857178E5@noqsi.com>
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com

On 25/08/15 14:25, John Doty wrote:
> Perhaps not so much you, but much of the “let’s make gschem better” that I see here is really “let’s make gschem more like pcb”. And, of course, the reason I find pcb such a horror is that it is not like gschem in its design.
Isn't the whole idea in this thread "let's make gschem/pcb more accessible"?

Perhaps, I misunderstood.
Cheers, Robert.

- Raw text -