www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: geda-user/2015/08/25/08:26:03

X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-TCPREMOTEIP: 63.119.35.194
X-Authenticated-UID: jpd AT noqsi DOT com
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Subject: Re: off-topic: daydreaming about modularization (was: Re: [geda-user] Buttons for automation (obligatory grab at our shared 3rd rail) Re: [geda-user] Antifork)
From: John Doty <jpd AT noqsi DOT com>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1508251403030.6924@igor2priv>
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2015 08:25:28 -0400
Message-Id: <8DC5050C-49D2-49AD-94B0-A1FC857178E5@noqsi.com>
References: <CAM2RGhTJ-gywb3LrkKoNKUxkwJCTsJ7vRxiLtmrXa5Mnp0331w AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <DUB125-W46D6798DBF674B80F24208C6620 AT phx DOT gbl> <6B8DDCCF-0E84-43DC-94A3-89CE0E56F0ED AT noqsi DOT com> <201508242052 DOT 28189 DOT ad252 AT freeelectron DOT net> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1508250534570 DOT 6924 AT igor2priv> <3766120C-93DD-454D-B2FA-7C79B78DC86C AT noqsi DOT com> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1508251403030 DOT 6924 AT igor2priv>
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id t7PCPhfN016365
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Aug 25, 2015, at 8:05 AM, gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu wrote:

> 
> 
> On Tue, 25 Aug 2015, John Doty wrote:
> 
>> 
>> On Aug 24, 2015, at 11:56 PM, gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu wrote:
>> 
>>> The drive is low too: even with the clumsy modelling John likes to keep bashing pcb for, it works surprisingly well in practice.
>> 
>> I think part of our problem is that if pcb makes sense to you, gschem does not, and vice-versa.
> 
> Can't remember where I said gschem didn't make sense to me... To me both of them make a lot of sense, and I see the shortcomings of both. I don't think gschem is perfect, either.
> 

Perhaps not so much you, but much of the “let’s make gschem better” that I see here is really “let’s make gschem more like pcb”. And, of course, the reason I find pcb such a horror is that it is not like gschem in its design.

John Doty              Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd.
http://www.noqsi.com/
jpd AT noqsi DOT com



- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019