X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:content-type;
	bh=5CDx94CDTgro39i1mBS7hCWGWg8gVIdZLjAyDNIfVQ8=;
	b=uDtjYJ7QItBz9iGndA8mge491NIbrIMYHaiWQU4+U0fpgPyS6Bf6rotMErXSN361HM
	6yQFUKeN1ugiFouNei9TTmBmZp5Hltse3xKp473nKR2oOk39Evz40oE+Em1B63VASjw9
	M5MRFZ7vSuLfqfRm8/qu6aw7Mw059t914atyW+TZtLR4wKJItkM652wqePwG5JdQ2H0o
	2dEJEMiuVV7F5bNH8Cdb9d4oin6gFdwRMptSsdGSVAzzhbWxMOINWF5Fk6+hlL4XsTnF
	T2lpBKwbjL9KnU8NoL2nWHqyFJrjJNtLikp2DDWBQmA6iGtnuRFgTi3FEBs6WZNvoHQb
	DMTg==
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Received:	by 10.50.92.67 with SMTP id ck3mr1100641igb.93.1440491225986; Tue,
	25 Aug 2015 01:27:05 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To:	<201508250312.t7P3CIUG027159@envy.delorie.com>
References:	<20150824223846 DOT 0ba61ba7 AT jive DOT levalinux DOT org>
	<CAM2RGhTHd-ZLc5m7gWkPoGczUbkFEtikdwgin0=HJnV0AcGEmg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<201508250312 DOT t7P3CIUG027159 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
Date:	Tue, 25 Aug 2015 10:27:05 +0200
Message-ID:	<CACwWb3By=-TK8TMpPaauFXTrtkwGvDcQABsgcF3eAU-hkWh-VQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] pcb file format
From:	"Levente (leventelist AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	gEDA User Mailing List <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

--e89a8ffbabc5d3bc68051e1e7fcd
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Okay. I want to clarify one thing. I have full respect for gEDA developers.
I have made lots of boards with gEDA.

But I think we have to move on.

AFAIK in footprints, one can not have silkscreen ploygons.

On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 5:12 AM, DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com> wrote:

>
> > I think (DJ is the authority here) our current file architecture does
> > not do ovals
>
> We do round-ended rectangles (i.e. for tssop pads), square and round,
> and octagons.
>
> > > With this data format, one can define arbitrary footprints. No
> restrictions
> > > like "no silkscreen polygons".
> >
> > To be fair to DJ and the other authors those are not arbitrary. Folks
> > just kind of coded themselves into a corner.
>
> And we do have silkscreen polygons ;-)
>

--e89a8ffbabc5d3bc68051e1e7fcd
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><div><div>Okay. I want to clarify one thing. I have full r=
espect for gEDA developers. I have made lots of boards with gEDA.<br><br></=
div>But I think we have to move on.<br><br></div>AFAIK in footprints, one c=
an not have silkscreen ploygons.<br></div><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><br><d=
iv class=3D"gmail_quote">On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 5:12 AM, DJ Delorie <span =
dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:dj AT delorie DOT com" target=3D"_blank">dj AT delo=
rie.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D=
"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class=
=3D""><br>
&gt; I think (DJ is the authority here) our current file architecture does<=
br>
&gt; not do ovals<br>
<br>
</span>We do round-ended rectangles (i.e. for tssop pads), square and round=
,<br>
and octagons.<br>
<span class=3D""><br>
&gt; &gt; With this data format, one can define arbitrary footprints. No re=
strictions<br>
&gt; &gt; like &quot;no silkscreen polygons&quot;.<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; To be fair to DJ and the other authors those are not arbitrary. Folks<=
br>
&gt; just kind of coded themselves into a corner.<br>
<br>
</span>And we do have silkscreen polygons ;-)<br>
</blockquote></div><br></div>

--e89a8ffbabc5d3bc68051e1e7fcd--

- Raw text -