www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
X-Authentication-Warning: | delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f |
Date: | Tue, 28 Jul 2015 23:13:01 -0400 |
Message-Id: | <201507290313.t6T3D15d026939@envy.delorie.com> |
From: | DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com> |
To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
In-reply-to: | <20150729030520.3437.qmail@stuge.se> (geda-user@delorie.com) |
Subject: | Re: [geda-user] gEDA fail metrics |
References: | <CAOP4iL3PR9Yu1g+iKbQqkYY-pLYBvFFfRUDKmiYhLZTQH0Tbag AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1507290419490 DOT 6924 AT igor2priv> <201507290247 DOT t6T2lYPF025964 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <20150729030520 DOT 3437 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se> |
Reply-To: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | geda-user AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
> DJ Delorie wrote: > > I feel that way about cmake - it might be a good system, but since > > I don't know it, I avoid things that use it. > > Doesn't that say a lot more about you than about cmake? That's the point. cmake isn't as popular, people don't know how to use it, so given the choice, they avoid it. Hence, "popularity contest". GNU Make may not always be the best tool for the job, but more people are familiar with it and thus comfortable using it. More people == more potential contributors. We're having a similar conversation about guile - whether it's the right language for the job is only one consideration; whether most of our users feel comfortable using it is another.
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |