X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=U96+5myl8oR1yWRY3MUfXFcjlLCIBfpv/ejE4gXNCbs=;
	b=teluF6WGG5s2hzTBNy4MwFT+Y66l9evLrciPFQLhJhD8YdY3owgZR9ah4r3nnU31t1
	B5o6rOYVg85tVhZDmuE6GvfIitJfrUKDh1tMFLtEFTAP7MLCruxBFDCVj8vVTz0yG8Vj
	1DCfprAz6Z+d64FZgE5YoHGRurWN2hORekDAv7hgyreBQR9+MsZupD5joirUiGGjBm9e
	+UK5OHWfj2uT25yd1lhckrLVXfwkIYAHWnI7viVK0GfP7AvtSSXmxfSqVklGdDTVljqh
	KNIoTbSMHx2rf6bSwzKoIvcOkpYiKYLvfdI5sLh0vRs0Crdjv846rVHBgnAw9Kl7BSKu
	vBpQ==
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Received:	by 10.180.107.70 with SMTP id ha6mr25013382wib.20.1438019689134;
	Mon, 27 Jul 2015 10:54:49 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To:	<20150727154025.GA2752@localhost.localdomain>
References:	<mnv04v$if0$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org>
	<0A5D410F-D1EF-4FC6-AF0F-BB13218B1615 AT icloud DOT com>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1507131000330 DOT 6924 AT igor2priv>
	<mo1rd7$oef$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org>
	<20150714084906 DOT GC14371 AT localhost DOT localdomain>
	<moheag$673$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org>
	<20150720131753 DOT GA19305 AT localhost DOT localdomain>
	<mp0moh$jq2$2 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org>
	<20150726122814 DOT GE8789 AT localhost DOT localdomain>
	<D5842CA0-C378-4C78-9E58-6B28267A269C AT noqsi DOT com>
	<20150727154025 DOT GA2752 AT localhost DOT localdomain>
Date:	Mon, 27 Jul 2015 09:54:48 -0800
Message-ID:	<CAC4O8c8ZBfoE0WyK9HukHENE1GUmcB61TGCA4X5QDFX6eg2w0w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] The new to do
From:	"Britton Kerin (britton DOT kerin AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id t6RHsqAr026759
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 7:40 AM, Vladimir Zhbanov (vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com)
[via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 07:22:04AM -0600, John Doty wrote:
>>
>> On Jul 26, 2015, at 6:28 AM, Vladimir Zhbanov (vzhbanov AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
>>
>> > On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 09:06:56PM +0200, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
>> > ...
>> >>> Anyway, the script for gschem is attached.
>> >>
>> >> Unfortunately, it is all greek, err, guile to me. But good to see that
>> >> this kind of tasks can be tackled in current gschem.
>> >
>> > The guile syntax is simple enough, any function has the following form
>> >  (function-name arg1 arg2 …)
>>
>> Lisp is based on some very simple ideas. Scheme started out as a
>> simple, disciplined dialect of Lisp. Guile is a bloated, complex,
>> undisciplined implementation of Scheme. Almost 2000 defined symbols
>> before you load libraries or user code. The manual is almost 900
>> pages. The simple core is still there, but it’s hard to find through
>> all of the fog.
>
> This state of things is because of trying to support the new R6RS
> standard (and some of main Scheme distributions already support it
> completely [1]).
>
> However, R7RS tries to fix this breakage of simplicity by "splitting
> Scheme into two languanges" [2] one of which should be simple.
>
> [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scheme_(programming_language)#R6RS
> [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scheme_(programming_language)#R7RS

What a joke.  The lisp community makes it hopeless fragmentation
official.

Britton

- Raw text -