X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Date:	Sun, 26 Jul 2015 13:43:00 +0200 (CEST)
X-X-Sender:	igor2 AT igor2priv
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Debug:	to=geda-user AT delorie DOT com from="gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu"
From:	gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] [pcb-rnd] Release 1.0.1
In-Reply-To:	<alpine.DEB.2.11.1507261244220.2952@nimbus>
Message-ID:	<alpine.DEB.2.00.1507261342200.6924@igor2priv>
References:	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1507251158120 DOT 6924 AT igor2priv> <CAOFvGD4TDEWGTvOF=mfzsQA1WDVL_qaZ4wjqRtLd9Pe5=qX4Pg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <mp0mkj$jq2$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1507260340280 DOT 6924 AT igor2priv> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 11 DOT 1507261244220 DOT 2952 AT nimbus>
User-Agent:	Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Sun, 26 Jul 2015, Roland Lutz wrote:

> On Sun, 26 Jul 2015, gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu wrote:
>> On Sat, 25 Jul 2015, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
>>> I feel like the default library should be a simple set of ready made
>>> files. These files may or even should be produced algorithmically at
>>> compile time.
>> 
>> I disagree here. There are way too many combination. This method results in 
>> too many files _and_ missing files. Often through mechanisms involving "dip 
>> pacakges above N pins are always wider", which is just not true. As an user 
>> I find learning such custom rules, or what the N, M or W suffix really means 
>> is harder and more risky (footprint-mismatch-wise) than a proper generator.
>
> The problem here is, some footprint generators have a lot of parameters, e.g. 
> for pin and pad sizes, silk line width, pin row/column distance, etc. With my

Did you check my syntax? I think I managed to solve this.

- Raw text -