X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:content-type;
	bh=lT5KVzgEirol8FPfWxg2100+KTWkY3WlhNnwfDGDpdA=;
	b=AzkZRbMQYpP06ApTnblvoJJHOvIgxAIyNoton3gA4oIZ1bISUUN38k/2qmwHRkusgW
	5/bijPcGhcTypvPSoSfBS+Ewb5LFGYgqobaNQczoIh+nlZa0tb4dG2DiHpu2ibBNrQtr
	wA3bX0Ix0qVtHWRnU0r6svblgsFA89MjMio0uNpXbu6vanzPLb98JSPZxRAGV4AUT4H0
	Q3Yr0xBHp2Vx4jDpAfU1H91m6Ntjp17zHJEjbN5fWWp+PbWjZf1shtS5ri81VE1eYgsN
	X6dlEU8E3NGQaGGuYTcInbu9EdVAQNtsWdIQIwx6yhH+rVGwqxGTruCmNjbWHVhKO1M9
	9NBQ==
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Received:	by 10.202.15.11 with SMTP id 11mr17167687oip.127.1437872511098;
	Sat, 25 Jul 2015 18:01:51 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To:	<mp1804$851$1@ger.gmane.org>
References:	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1507251158120 DOT 6924 AT igor2priv>
	<CAOFvGD4TDEWGTvOF=mfzsQA1WDVL_qaZ4wjqRtLd9Pe5=qX4Pg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<mp0mkj$jq2$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org>
	<CAOFvGD4etQbqLE5X9qYAZ202X70jAQAd4zPpg2VUOUW7u=Zdsw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<mp1804$851$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org>
Date:	Sat, 25 Jul 2015 21:01:51 -0400
Message-ID:	<CAOFvGD5KcLXQt=bw2B1wDHRot4yQ0TFniYbjaJMZjo9-HjOVWw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] [pcb-rnd] Release 1.0.1
From:	"Jason White (whitewaterssoftwareinfo AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> Algorithmic footprint creation on the fly moves footprint creation out
> of the immediate realm of the user. This makes it even less
> accessible.

I suspect you have a different definition of accessible than I. This
(parametric footprints, inside pcb-rnd) is available here and today;
its easier to use than digging drawing a symbol from scratch every
time. It provides an excellent starting point for users to make their
own custom footprints. Remember, parametric footprints can be saved
and modified just like normal footprints.

If you think users will use it as a crutch, you are right! That
indicates something quite important, the footprint creation process is
not intuitive. A new user must read the documentation if they want to
make (or use) a custom footprint, period.  The way things are set up
in PCB, the user stand little chance of figuring it out how to do it
by themselves.

> All of this is is also achieved by algorithmic creation at build time. [As opposed to doing it in t]

Why *only* at build time? Would you have the user recompile PCB each
time they want a new parametric footprint?

Surely it has occurred to you that Igor2's parametric footprint
mechanism could be used around compile time to generate the standard
library, right?

-- 
Jason White

- Raw text -