X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Injected-Via-Gmane:	http://gmane.org/
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
From:	Kai-Martin Knaak <kmk AT familieknaak DOT de>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] The new to do
Date:	Sat, 25 Jul 2015 17:17:05 +0200
Lines:	23
Message-ID:	<mp099h$cir$1@ger.gmane.org>
References:	<CAM2RGhQ70Pex5aNeQ86vKHc7sKf_Vpws69__CPb2QKg6fJTeHg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <mnv04v$if0$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org> <0A5D410F-D1EF-4FC6-AF0F-BB13218B1615 AT icloud DOT com> <mo1uus$cmb$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org> <201507140318 DOT t6E3IElw031504 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <mohenr$bj9$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org> <CAM2RGhROYFyVO4oRCxKtrp9Wu5rRA42weqSq8EHwpfbPz-j3+A AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-Complaints-To:	usenet AT ger DOT gmane DOT org
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host:	a89-182-126-155.net-htp.de
User-Agent:	KNode/4.14.1
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com

Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via 
geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:

>> A sufficiently versatile package format would provide a solution to
>> this problem. A package can be viewed as a way to integrate the
>> knowledge about the various aspects of components.
>>
>> A package can be as simple as a set of symbols and footprints. In
>> this case the knowledge would be the implicit statement that these
>> symbols and footprints are compatible. But it can also provide a
>> list of footprints which can be combined with a specific symbol. It
>> can also provide the information that a component needs to be
>> represented by a set of symbols (e.g. a opamp could be represented
>> by a triangle symbol and a separate supply symbol)
> 
> What about opamps that have more involved pinouts? For example I
> have some instrumentation opamps that are really involved.

I don't quite get what you are aiming at. Can you give an example for 
such a component?

 ---<)kaimartin(>---

- Raw text -