X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Date:	Fri, 10 Jul 2015 04:35:29 +0200 (CEST)
X-X-Sender:	igor2 AT igor2priv
To:	"Svenn Are Bjerkem (svenn DOT bjerkem AT googlemail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
X-Debug:	to=geda-user AT delorie DOT com from="gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu"
From:	gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Repository Management was Re: developer
	excitement?
In-Reply-To:	<CAGde_xP_0+-JTp13DM1LgOuUO-BWdB563yXEcqJjfdPE8S5tAg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID:	<alpine.DEB.2.00.1507100433460.6924@igor2priv>
References:	<CAM2RGhR3+FdR4PXTKa5CvSEAdcR=ifX_SgCPgS7NatCA14P9zQ AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1507091944210 DOT 6924 AT igor2priv> <CAGde_xP_0+-JTp13DM1LgOuUO-BWdB563yXEcqJjfdPE8S5tAg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
User-Agent:	Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

  This message is in MIME format.  The first part should be readable text,
  while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools.

--0-391036136-1436495729=:6924
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE



On Fri, 10 Jul 2015, Svenn Are Bjerkem (svenn DOT bjerkem AT googlemail DOT com) [via =
geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:

>
>On 9 July 2015 at 19:51, <gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu> wrote:
>      Btw, this problem is pretty irrelevant by now: it was a problem
>      many years ago. Nowdays the major problem, as far as I
>      understand, is that there's literally noone who even decides
>      about patches.
>
>
>What is a good way to test out patches without having to garble up a
>clean=C2=A0install of the released geda? Try it out on a separate computer=
 or
>a=C2=A0virtualbox?
>

Virtualbox sounds like a bit heavyweight. If you don't like the prefix=20
solution others suggested, you could also try chroot. Unlike prefix,=20
chroot already allows you to use different library versions, but doesn't=20
require simulating a whole machine.

Regards,

Igor2

--0-391036136-1436495729=:6924--

- Raw text -