X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:content-type;
	bh=e4chsSb4OTnPSbJTdj5f8hOR2VPAZAa3783dArXDGmc=;
	b=BzIzdaqX1nnpV7gpujnx/F4WC+5aFwKXsN6PKf7WUQ2TZjA+x0cXkgEjxtNCbwFv/c
	hzf6FYlP0xNgzjHy/1zX2gYLx5swOvfQtLoNQEtLOIIa8+8LNerFivPbMltt102LSlNk
	JMm29ommpsLLD/28g4+Izp7UH+WMC+mFeCZXT9frevDSLXa4ZM7VCjimpPGH/54IWDpE
	fpjATB5UVtZQZgq+dm2Mxv2KqmmT2PI0kBcUrRC0HdFbY29aDohZljaeSpny2ZOh5ojZ
	PR2ycsyEA9R94oq9mQZbd1koKMVw46u1epGRGZlIcYtKJbw46KXXq7sHrCV4IMNawUfC
	osyg==
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Received:	by 10.112.164.35 with SMTP id yn3mr16256079lbb.91.1436473572157;
	Thu, 09 Jul 2015 13:26:12 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To:	<559db19f.c344440a.fb20d.ffff9fff@mx.google.com>
References:	<CAM2RGhQEph=UcvQ36r+pB_1ck-FYoCQM4TyRsz9_rMzvfdmoqA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<559db19f DOT c344440a DOT fb20d DOT ffff9fff AT mx DOT google DOT com>
Date:	Thu, 9 Jul 2015 16:26:12 -0400
Message-ID:	<CAM2RGhRV+KPk=C=XjhbBW_yksBQd8YwH37dEOk0PMoCpEgChHQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Re: developer excitement?
From:	"Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 7:26 PM, Lilith Bryant (dark141 AT gmail DOT com) [via
geda-user AT delorie DOT com] <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
> On 2015-07-09 10:34:21 AM, Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
>> DJ, when my projects have projects this is what I fall into
>> https://xkcd.com/974/
>>
>> Not everyone stops on the way to fixing their furnace and improves
>> autorouting. Our workflows in real life are fundamentally different.
>>
>
> Agreed.   The small amount of work I've done on PCB has been necessary for
> getting jobs out the door.
>
> Which leads to a bigger problem I see of repo fragmentation.   There seems to be a
> bunch of great looking branches for PCB, but there seems to be little will to pull them
> into the mainline.
>
> How many patches are sitting in the bug tracker that haven't ever been looked at?
>
> Fully appreciate that everyone (including myself) has a life/paying job/more interesting
> stuff to do,  but I get the feeling that if I do contribute more, it'll just sit forever in a repo
> branch somewhere and rot.
>
> I'm going to fix the bugs in track dragging branch and fix ortho to maintain dragged tracks at
> 45degs,  so I'm not talking anything esoteric here.  Not sexy, but possibly a real usability help.

YES! I am a bit scared off of touching PCB but if I can find I way I
will help you!

> But does anyone with repo access care enough for it to even looked at?  Not saying anyone
> necessarily *should* care.  But if not, I'm not going to waste my time getting my changes
> to a production quality,  as opposed to just doing a dirty hack for myself.

Fair point.

- Raw text -