X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:content-type;
	bh=zRWXRxWvdssbJj/fJDIVr22SSTxD0Y3PWVaXNx2dO4k=;
	b=YNZOzKRp2OiwEw0uFlU61PdW20tpz80E8Ve953TV3cA3Oixybju/kIkBtN/gx1Lr1j
	QgJVoCVEPOK8KtAzumd+tXdMplxrt16keItMWzVcEQGwQuUoFXrk2C5kyPT/KjfktlXP
	gGJib9ZWJ7dgkCZuwXR+hvGzap93sPy6n/IFmGlRZRi9u9Jwl070ozO0YVjLmEsKeto4
	rMoDs5zqB3osCik3vtjyu5mHD8J5VIXx2lKxCtYUPmm7o2S9Joo5ryscrLoZ7qJSznm4
	13KOMka/pljYqCQygJ7qNvQddextbNXSxQBuDNMNLbKRGzrLBuR8xrjnfdiK5m5szYlE
	daTQ==
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Received:	by 10.194.89.5 with SMTP id bk5mr33142685wjb.144.1436460332048;
	Thu, 09 Jul 2015 09:45:32 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To:	<559db19f.c344440a.fb20d.ffff9fff@mx.google.com>
References:	<CAM2RGhQEph=UcvQ36r+pB_1ck-FYoCQM4TyRsz9_rMzvfdmoqA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<559db19f DOT c344440a DOT fb20d DOT ffff9fff AT mx DOT google DOT com>
Date:	Thu, 9 Jul 2015 08:45:31 -0800
Message-ID:	<CAC4O8c8ya1n2c9f3w5SyZx6F1GF5CKAp8nVeHQptxaVKh3psPQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] Re: developer excitement?
From:	"Britton Kerin (britton DOT kerin AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com]" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 3:26 PM, Lilith Bryant (dark141 AT gmail DOT com) [via
geda-user AT delorie DOT com] <geda-user AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
> On 2015-07-09 10:34:21 AM, Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
>> DJ, when my projects have projects this is what I fall into
>> https://xkcd.com/974/
>>
>> Not everyone stops on the way to fixing their furnace and improves
>> autorouting. Our workflows in real life are fundamentally different.
>>
>
> I'm going to fix the bugs in track dragging branch and fix ortho to maintain dragged tracks at
> 45degs,  so I'm not talking anything esoteric here.  Not sexy, but possibly a real usability help.

Sounds really good.  Is this the same as the branch you're talking about:

http://www.rowetel.com/blog/?p=25

Another thing I would love to be able to do: drag a via along a track, and have
it automatically move the track under the drag to the other layer.  How hard
would this be to implement based on your familiarity with pcb internals?
Or is it already possible and I don't know?

Britton

- Raw text -