X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Message-ID:	<1435942066.672.22.camel@ssalewski.de>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] gEDA/gschem still alive?
From:	Stefan Salewski <mail AT ssalewski DOT de>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Date:	Fri, 03 Jul 2015 18:47:46 +0200
In-Reply-To:	<CAOP4iL3VBaS+bJhKJDk=_iuBSjDPY2-pvMdz5zPnf7A_rwD0Jw@mail.gmail.com>
References:	<1435510363 DOT 682 DOT 26 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de>
	<20150703030409 DOT 32398 DOT qmail AT stuge DOT se>
	<CAM2RGhSb=z35RYaJQmh-S4N73ng9WOj4ySmy_05J-7KGdBv8SA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<CAOP4iL3VBaS+bJhKJDk=_iuBSjDPY2-pvMdz5zPnf7A_rwD0Jw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
X-Mailer:	Evolution 3.12.11
Mime-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Fri, 2015-07-03 at 08:32 -0700, Ouabache Designworks
(z3qmtr45 AT gmail DOT com) [via geda-user AT delorie DOT com] wrote:
> You also have the big issues like the choice of scheme as gEDAs
> scripting
> language and the gEDA file formats. Is there anything to gain by
> changing
> and if so then what would be better and how do we transition?

I know that some people really like scheme. And I do admit that lisp
like languages are very powerful and interesting. But they are not very
popular by average people.

I see the main problem in mixing C and scheme, which makes thinks more
complicated. Maybe that mixing was not a bad decision 30 years ago, but
today I would prefer only one single language for all. (Python or Ruby
seems to be not bad and fast enough, but my impression is that Nim or
Crystal are even better choices today.)

For File Format: I was thinking about using JSON or YAML beside the
gschem format. The effort for that should be very low, but currently I
see no big benefit. XML may be an other alternative.

- Raw text -