X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Original-DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:content-type;
	bh=gVg5enX/c1L/lvlh7LObBlNTQUF1boKvhy5dzFcJcMc=;
	b=q+N3rsKB5KDw8BKL3w3/IV+DzzXCdBz61oYWHBpazZFPwMamD0b69dpMdxrUr/HTUo
	VHDi1jvNajVBNANLC0cpQO9kzUS+WdEXLAkc9vn5XjQ7ak5t2eLsfVwGWbsdOP5yf+8Y
	7HBu3Q9MZZT/+juR7S3iK8EchYDfznCn1LsFM7oKYvcxIv0ync03dJQwz36S2mTg/Qs6
	GeTyMgVQxBFP/kK4HDindlRRYKjXbqeLwaG6sX6L2oI4ghVxs7DUG6TmCM3kUoRBKrv7
	byPm7w3sQx5RUCIPui0IWS8JU3VULG24X2Asph6zn9/CrdXCDncJy6k0S09DKHEmxvpM
	CNTA==
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Received:	by 10.112.222.133 with SMTP id qm5mr10777409lbc.86.1435517383322;
	Sun, 28 Jun 2015 11:49:43 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To:	<alpine.DEB.2.00.1506281932040.6924@igor2priv>
References:	<1435510363 DOT 682 DOT 26 DOT camel AT ssalewski DOT de>
	<55902AB9 DOT 9000004 AT neurotica DOT com>
	<alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1506281932040 DOT 6924 AT igor2priv>
Date:	Sun, 28 Jun 2015 18:49:43 +0000
Message-ID:	<CAM2RGhREeJEXhXhj2Guq-pnswDbY_aWp-_PTYeAC0e4yb93_yw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] gEDA/gschem still alive?
From:	"Evan Foss (evanfoss AT gmail DOT com)" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

I have been using it since 2004 for home/school and at work since
2009. I have no idea what gave you the impression it was dead.

gschem reached a level of refinement that has basically meant no
additional features were needed. Great work developers!

On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 5:35 PM,  <gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu> wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, 28 Jun 2015, Dave McGuire (mcguire AT neurotica DOT com) wrote:
>
>> On 06/28/2015 12:52 PM, Stefan Salewski wrote:
>>>
>>> Recently I saw some messages on gEDA list, last was something about
>>> Python netlister just now. So maybe my impression that geda/gschem usage
>>> and development is nearly death is wrong?
>>
>>
>>  I don't know why you would have that impression.  I use it almost
>> every day, I just don't talk about it much on the mailing list unless I
>> am looking for help with something.  I suspect it's the same for much of
>> the user base.
>
>
> Me too. I did a lot of hobby projects and a few projects for a company with
> gEDA.
>
> I am happy that there are no new releases of gschem stuffed with new
> features - for me, gschem is complete.
>
> Regards,
>
> Igor2
>
>



-- 
Home
http://evanfoss.googlepages.com/
Work
http://forge.abcd.harvard.edu/gf/project/epl_engineering/wiki/

- Raw text -