X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
Date:	Sat, 14 Feb 2015 14:28:32 -0500
Message-Id:	<201502141928.t1EJSWoi022831@envy.delorie.com>
From:	DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to:	<749069FC-424B-4516-A37A-735CF9052EB9@noqsi.com> (message from
	John Doty on Sat, 14 Feb 2015 09:16:57 -1000)
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] on the choice of languages
References:	<mblhhr$uvp$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org> <CAOuGh89uhX3p+=AbcgZ20gen0hP4rg9FngAaMo3d4HVQ3bF0ow AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <mbltsv$ae2$1 AT ger DOT gmane DOT org> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1502140527190 DOT 7324 AT igor2priv> <1423934635 DOT 760 DOT 7 DOT camel AT cam DOT ac DOT uk> <749069FC-424B-4516-A37A-735CF9052EB9 AT noqsi DOT com>
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> Yes, but to contribute to that, you really need to be part of the
> inner circle . . . The strange tribal sensitivities of the inner
> circle don't affect you.

Please stop spreading this nonsense.  I've been giving out git access
to anyone who shows a bit of promise, and we've got a big "inner
circle" that's too afraid to do anything because people like you
critisize their every move.

Personally, I think our community sucks.  Example:

> I would dispute that they are *all* badly written.

Who would want to contribute, knowing that this is the type of
comments they're likely to get?

- Raw text -