X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:content-type;
	bh=sXmxgyboHFOcYNU5m6Feq9zBulVYZ7HyigkWyMsSJbw=;
	b=k3vChnrTB9vCm0pXBls9xurdkwBlRNntIlFxWrOYQ7Q/KyIWVGYj5FoG425dLzYYd6
	I5SuRZ61XL4TA+qH667y7NZureyJVwTqrWwCvf61lklHovpb2QALIpHwxFskC5hOJ7Zh
	rxHKObm/6lsC42A0w932VQH9b0Jnt4LXXQhjrXhkV3bKd9pOBdcrKhAZXiK0jOF5XzL6
	mVRjqgad2xe8ULRW60/4EWndMz7tFKxY1H0m78ffdmjhaVM6k6QWeBW0x+g6+GAefffx
	l5DKcehqxUqANWEUHxYedhKFuQnDJPasNJnQD4GIhvcciiXnH+Y+JvhlFIepflxcLb0w
	5hsA==
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Received:	by 10.152.42.169 with SMTP id p9mr9645345lal.91.1423358854597;
	Sat, 07 Feb 2015 17:27:34 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To:	<201502080108.t1818x8P031447@envy.delorie.com>
References:	<CAOP4iL2stWVCy3WK0=SNu2zAbs8t6B0uyAgFuOnzG8v_MrYNfw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<CAGde_xN5gs5r_on=HP2RN7cy6E=2EL9eK3cp+sd9BfBaWNLVew AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<20150204193720 DOT Horde DOT 42xUN-NzhCJRWZne-M5eCQ1 AT webmail DOT in-berlin DOT de>
	<90236728-E79D-47C7-BFB1-34140DB85ACB AT sbcglobal DOT net>
	<CAOFvGD4M48Ap=UQzL_T3yzas2rJrNFfxXRUOkOe8gA8J3bQCHg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<1423323918 DOT 1592 DOT 10 DOT camel AT cam DOT ac DOT uk>
	<CAOFvGD6rwqf79obnSRQ4gyM0h8_5PQ-C0G2guRp8YU80oOAkig AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<1423329222 DOT 1592 DOT 12 DOT camel AT cam DOT ac DOT uk>
	<54D67B5B DOT 6060205 AT neurotica DOT com>
	<CAM2RGhTsJczAgDN7v1AeO9wRVmJjDCswUNuy=QhzK7eJRVwMuw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<20150207221252 DOT GA26071 AT recycle DOT lbl DOT gov>
	<201502072246 DOT t17MktFH026329 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
	<CAM2RGhTzA2_JVJAfAg-7wanE-nSah2B9p-bGwrstfK_8DrCmFA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<201502080108 DOT t1818x8P031447 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
Date:	Sat, 7 Feb 2015 20:27:34 -0500
Message-ID:	<CAM2RGhT2G15kCrQR75OKwrjnkfHQL41vFw+w2ha4fmEFUd679A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] FOSDEM
From:	Evan Foss <evanfoss AT gmail DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

I don't disagree. I want to see the blue sky documentation. I just
find this whole thing about Lua/XML to be a giant distraction. The
current file format is extremely readable. It is the source that is
not.

I know people would like to never have to look at the text of say a
footprint file but I have come to accept that it is just a part of
life.



On Sat, Feb 7, 2015 at 8:08 PM, DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com> wrote:
>
>> DJ while those are all really good ideas my impression of the PCB
>> source is that it would take a lot of work to implement.
>
> That's an understatement, and the crux of the problem.
>
>> gschem's source was clear to me, PCB was not.
>
> PCB's source is *ancient*.  Even a simple clean-up pass would be a
> large undertaking.  It's probably one of the first examples of
> object-oriented programming.
>
>> It would be nice to have a draft of what the future PCB file format
>> would look like building off of what we have now instead of
>> reinventing the wheel.
>
> There are things we can do now.  It's still important to have a
> long-term goal in mind.



-- 
Home
http://evanfoss.googlepages.com/
Work
http://forge.abcd.harvard.edu/gf/project/epl_engineering/wiki/

- Raw text -