X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Date:	Sat, 7 Feb 2015 10:09:52 +0100 (CET)
X-X-Sender:	igor2 AT igor2priv
To:	"geda-user AT delorie DOT com" <geda-user AT delorie DOT com>
X-Debug:	to=geda-user AT delorie DOT com from="gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu"
From:	gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] FOSDEM
In-Reply-To:	<0BB497A3-1B7E-41FD-A6A3-935EB1259DD9@icloud.com>
Message-ID:	<alpine.DEB.2.00.1502071002040.7324@igor2priv>
References:	<1420499386 DOT 3521 DOT 3 DOT camel AT cam DOT ac DOT uk> <54CFD589 DOT 9040702 AT xs4all DOT nl> <CAHBYzfRkn-nJb4JfrDYyaD0WwPrpZvAgi0QdHCusgz185iNoHA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <CAGde_xN-iNZUvHh-E47kx1EyoPRt1018wWiDwHhYQ9+od+cJwA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20150203112631 DOT 3507a0c1 AT Parasomnia DOT thuis DOT lan>
	<20150204054256 DOT Horde DOT Pm1JV8RJbICk9SHvIGwZ7A3 AT webmail DOT in-berlin DOT de> <CAOP4iL2stWVCy3WK0=SNu2zAbs8t6B0uyAgFuOnzG8v_MrYNfw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <CAGde_xN5gs5r_on=HP2RN7cy6E=2EL9eK3cp+sd9BfBaWNLVew AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20150204193720 DOT Horde DOT 42xUN-NzhCJRWZne-M5eCQ1 AT webmail DOT in-berlin DOT de>
	<90236728-E79D-47C7-BFB1-34140DB85ACB AT sbcglobal DOT net> <CAOFvGD4M48Ap=UQzL_T3yzas2rJrNFfxXRUOkOe8gA8J3bQCHg AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <201502042333 DOT t14NX28o024789 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <7C1A5871-3056-482C-BC58-173D90D80F77 AT icloud DOT com> <CAOFvGD7vdircWqDYWKrKPY49gpYo4ZGsw20q9yE+4+gno3ZkhA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<F66800B5-AAC3-459C-B6BC-B2F1E4AC98CC AT noqsi DOT com> <alpine DOT DEB DOT 2 DOT 00 DOT 1502061931470 DOT 7324 AT igor2priv> <0BB497A3-1B7E-41FD-A6A3-935EB1259DD9 AT icloud DOT com>
User-Agent:	Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Sat, 7 Feb 2015, Chris Smith wrote:

>
>> On 6 Feb 2015, at 18:44, gedau AT igor2 DOT repo DOT hu wrote:
>>
>> So the question is: what's the smallest C or python or awk or whatever non-lua program you can write that can parse the file _without_ depending on a lua interpreter? And how far can it go supporting the user exploiting lua features?
>
> What is the problem with depending on a Lua interpreter? Please bear in mind that we're not talking about a behemoth like Python or PERL here, with numerous dependencies and files scattered over the system. Lua is a single C library with a simple API, about 50kB in size that can be statically linked if you want. Bindings to other languages of choice are available.
>
> I think Lua is being skewed in people's minds by the terms 'script' and 'interpreter'. In use Lua behaves much more like an XML or YAML library.


The point is simple: some people suggest to have a simple file format 
with an open spec so anyone can write his own parser. You suggest using 
an existing language and always link to a specific lib parsing it.

I prefer to stick to formats/protocols over libs/implementations. I tend 
to believe a good protocol lives much longer than a good implementation. 
Especially when talking about interchange of data...

Regards,

Igor2

- Raw text -