X-Authentication-Warning:	delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
DKIM-Signature:	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
	d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
	h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
	:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
	bh=tDrJlP08XQSvFEsvRlvAZv8ZRaXQWHzk0AeTUQbmk6U=;
	b=Wn8rF4vk5ImMQd+zBN0TdBA7LCyXggylWYLXEn37hys4/VLwFPpnSk+XL2l8vXMEhU
	z1OvXto+2Wujm6j8PL5YWVf68WAYKlrSvBp5m3f+r6Cv2/XzfD05hr5+1Wur5mwZLDsJ
	D64CzukYM9lC5knMUz5BAVtL08/6qgyrMH11fSPm/QTGI3vCp2wunCz22F5M9NjhMnrE
	fFAY71vViaUE3tXJKF+R19dQ6Gg7f6UcM2cjSyekFgmAabA/eY7RBI9H2/+xHGZRJvxL
	zeFWfzgRLS+ye3FOaomQGA8lTEE4UBJ43+LtRT9S8SKLQapcHOhevmI6KIxFFiMN5mm/
	PWyw==
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Received:	by 10.107.135.95 with SMTP id j92mr37102500iod.20.1423077496100;
	Wed, 04 Feb 2015 11:18:16 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To:	<FF660910-A2D0-449B-898C-F659A4CDAF0D@noqsi.com>
References:	<1420499386 DOT 3521 DOT 3 DOT camel AT cam DOT ac DOT uk>
	<20150202152654 DOT GA13336 AT cuci DOT nl>
	<54CFD589 DOT 9040702 AT xs4all DOT nl>
	<CAHBYzfRkn-nJb4JfrDYyaD0WwPrpZvAgi0QdHCusgz185iNoHA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<CAGde_xN-iNZUvHh-E47kx1EyoPRt1018wWiDwHhYQ9+od+cJwA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<20150203112631 DOT 3507a0c1 AT Parasomnia DOT thuis DOT lan>
	<20150204054256 DOT Horde DOT Pm1JV8RJbICk9SHvIGwZ7A3 AT webmail DOT in-berlin DOT de>
	<CAOP4iL2stWVCy3WK0=SNu2zAbs8t6B0uyAgFuOnzG8v_MrYNfw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
	<FF660910-A2D0-449B-898C-F659A4CDAF0D AT noqsi DOT com>
Date:	Wed, 4 Feb 2015 10:18:15 -0900
Message-ID:	<CAC4O8c9ApxnQ-UcBV1hv93yc2w_WdNcAz9hkGrUoNtVJ8VWPxw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject:	Re: [geda-user] FOSDEM
From:	Britton Kerin <britton DOT kerin AT gmail DOT com>
To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id t14JILH4029515
Reply-To:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 9:39 AM, John Doty <jpd AT noqsi DOT com> wrote:
>
> On Feb 3, 2015, at 10:27 PM, Ouabache Designworks <z3qmtr45 AT gmail DOT com>
> wrote:
>
> If we could get all the eda teams currently supporting their own tool flows
> to contribute to a single open source solution then we would all be a lot
> better off.
>
>
> There isn’t a single solution that will satisfy everybody. Many users want
> an integrated tool, but that is never going to scale well to complex
> projects with a lot of top level automation. Does anybody really imagine
> that a single flow can efficiently cover projects from afternoon throwaways
> to complex boards for space flight to mixed-signal ASICs? geda-gaf in

If they both use PCB boards, there's no reason that those aspects of both
projects couldn't share a lot more code than they do now, and do it without
disturbing simulation etc. that others are doing.  I wouldn't have to be an
integrated tool.

I think there are really just four things that everyone does:

1.  Get or make schematic symbols.  Many times this is a box with pins
2.  Get or make footprints
3.  Hook symbols to footprints
4.  Save reusable, pre-layed-out subcircuits somehow

There's the light-versus-heavy symbol issue which involves genuinely different
approaches on steps 1-3, but probably both could be accommodated in one
widely shared solution.  Besides this there really isn't much variation in
the above so its sort of maddening that everyone gets to re-invent it.

Britton

- Raw text -