www.delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: geda-user/2015/02/04/13:41:09

X-Authentication-Warning: delorie.com: mail set sender to geda-user-bounces using -f
X-Recipient: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-TCPREMOTEIP: 207.224.51.38
X-Authenticated-UID: jpd AT noqsi DOT com
From: John Doty <jpd AT noqsi DOT com>
Message-Id: <FF660910-A2D0-449B-898C-F659A4CDAF0D@noqsi.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\))
Subject: Re: [geda-user] FOSDEM
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2015 11:39:56 -0700
References: <1420499386 DOT 3521 DOT 3 DOT camel AT cam DOT ac DOT uk> <20150202152654 DOT GA13336 AT cuci DOT nl> <54CFD589 DOT 9040702 AT xs4all DOT nl> <CAHBYzfRkn-nJb4JfrDYyaD0WwPrpZvAgi0QdHCusgz185iNoHA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <CAGde_xN-iNZUvHh-E47kx1EyoPRt1018wWiDwHhYQ9+od+cJwA AT mail DOT gmail DOT com> <20150203112631 DOT 3507a0c1 AT Parasomnia DOT thuis DOT lan> <20150204054256 DOT Horde DOT Pm1JV8RJbICk9SHvIGwZ7A3 AT webmail DOT in-berlin DOT de> <CAOP4iL2stWVCy3WK0=SNu2zAbs8t6B0uyAgFuOnzG8v_MrYNfw AT mail DOT gmail DOT com>
To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
In-Reply-To: <CAOP4iL2stWVCy3WK0=SNu2zAbs8t6B0uyAgFuOnzG8v_MrYNfw@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6)
Reply-To: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To: nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: geda-user AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com

--Apple-Mail=_732398D9-C878-484F-AFDE-37B24D2290A2
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=windows-1252


On Feb 3, 2015, at 10:27 PM, Ouabache Designworks <z3qmtr45 AT gmail DOT com> =
wrote:

> If we could get all the eda teams currently supporting their own tool =
flows to contribute to a single open source solution then we would all =
be a lot better off.

There isn=92t a single solution that will satisfy everybody. Many users =
want an integrated tool, but that is never going to scale well to =
complex projects with a lot of top level automation. Does anybody really =
imagine that a single flow can efficiently cover projects from afternoon =
throwaways to complex boards for space flight to mixed-signal ASICs? =
geda-gaf in conjunction with ngspice actually covers schematic capture =
and simulation for that range pretty well, but not with a single common =
flow: you have to adapt it to *your* problem. The difference with other =
tools is that they're not so adaptable, so they won=92t be good for =
*your* problem.

John Doty              Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd.
http://www.noqsi.com/
jpd AT noqsi DOT com



--Apple-Mail=_732398D9-C878-484F-AFDE-37B24D2290A2
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset=windows-1252

<html><head><meta http-equiv=3D"Content-Type" content=3D"text/html =
charset=3Dwindows-1252"></head><body style=3D"word-wrap: break-word; =
-webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: =
after-white-space;"><br><div><div>On Feb 3, 2015, at 10:27 PM, Ouabache =
Designworks &lt;<a =
href=3D"mailto:z3qmtr45 AT gmail DOT com">z3qmtr45 AT gmail DOT com</a>&gt; =
wrote:</div><br class=3D"Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote =
type=3D"cite"><span style=3D"font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px; =
font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; =
letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: auto; text-align: =
start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; =
widows: auto; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; float: =
none; display: inline !important;">If we could get all the eda teams =
currently supporting their own tool flows to contribute to a single open =
source solution then we would all be a lot better =
off.</span></blockquote><br></div><div>There isn=92t a single solution =
that will satisfy everybody. Many users want an integrated tool, but =
that is never going to scale well to complex projects with a lot of top =
level automation. Does anybody really imagine that a single flow can =
efficiently cover projects from afternoon throwaways to complex boards =
for space flight to mixed-signal ASICs? geda-gaf in conjunction with =
ngspice actually covers schematic capture and simulation for that range =
pretty well, but not with a single common flow: you have to adapt it to =
*your* problem. The difference with other tools is that they're not so =
adaptable, so they won=92t be good for *your* problem.</div><br><div =
apple-content-edited=3D"true">
<span class=3D"Apple-style-span" style=3D"border-collapse: separate; =
border-spacing: 0px;"><p style=3D"margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px"><font =
face=3D"Helvetica" size=3D"3" style=3D"font: 12.0px Helvetica">John =
Doty<span class=3D"Apple-converted-space">&nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; &nbsp; =
&nbsp;<span class=3D"Apple-converted-space">&nbsp;</span><span =
class=3D"Apple-converted-tab">&nbsp; &nbsp;<span =
class=3D"Apple-converted-space">&nbsp;</span></span></span>Noqsi =
Aerospace, Ltd.</font></p><p style=3D"margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px =
0.0px"><a href=3D"http://www.noqsi.com/">http://www.noqsi.com/</a></p><p =
style=3D"margin: 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px 0.0px"><font face=3D"Helvetica" =
size=3D"3" style=3D"font: 12.0px Helvetica"><a =
href=3D"mailto:jpd AT noqsi DOT com">jpd AT noqsi DOT com</a></font></p><br =
class=3D"Apple-interchange-newline"></span>
</div>
<br></body></html>=

--Apple-Mail=_732398D9-C878-484F-AFDE-37B24D2290A2--

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019